Archive | Gideon Falter RSS feed for this section

Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions: AntiSemitism Fallacy An Attack On Free Speech

1 Jun

In June 2016, a UK-based organisation calling itself Jewish Human Rights Watch lost a High Court battle to outlaw Local Authorities from boycotting investment of employee pension funds and tax revenue in Israeli enterprises considered in breach of International Law and Human Right abuses against Palestinians.

In the ruling, Lord Justice Simon and Mr Justice Flaux dismissed the claim, considering that the case, brought by Robert Festenstein of @RHFSolicitors, was ill-conceived and failed on the basic facts.

In recent months, however, the UK government announced plans to implement new measures to curb the BDS movement and those who support boycotts, divestment, and sanctions in specific reference to the State of Israel. Note: BDS is not referenced in regard to any other sovereign state* accused of human rights abuses.

As part of the announcement, which one might essentially consider a totalitarian concept in an Orwellian-like effort pandering to a perceived sense of Jewish exceptionalism* and victimhood, Her Majesty’s Government also announced that it would adopt the deeply contested international definition of antiSemitism; a definition that includes outlawing boycotts, claiming that such actions are inherently antiSemitic.

Not only does this policy shift and implementation of an extremely narrow definition of antiSemitism effectively make it illegal to criticise or accuse Israel of acts of terrorism, occupation, or human rights abuses. It also makes boycotting – as a form of political protest, conscientious objection and pacifism – likely to be unlawful and potentially antiSemitic.

This definition goes further, stating that making reference to, or any accusations of the existence of a ‘Jewish’ or ‘Israeli lobby’, has lobbied for these changes and adoptions by foreign governments, should also be considered as antiSemitic.

Since 2015, Jewish Human Rights Watch has lobbied hard and fierce for this change in policy, as its director makes clear in the linked article below.

As noted by Daniel Sugarman of the Jewish Chronicle, the ‘Lobby’ includes organisations like Jewish Human Rights Watch. Its purpose is to “agitate” and “unsettle” opponents of Israel, says its director, Jonathan Neumann.

In the same piece, Neumann also states: “It’s no coincidence that when we started bringing these legal actions, this guidance and legislation started happening”.

To be clear, the adoption of the new definition of antiSemitism and the banning of boycotts against Israel is a completely draconian act, that would not have happened without the pressure, influence and relentless lobbying of the State of Israel and its actors and supporters.

In a classic defence of what has become known as Godwin’s Law and the fundamental right to peaceful protest and free speech, Netanyahu himself has labelled the BDS movement a direct attack on Jews, likening it to the activities of Nazi Germany.

The UK government is the first country in the World to acquiesce to Israel and its state actors in their demands.

This is hardly surprising, when one considers the pivotal role of the UK Government in the partition and annexation of what was originally Palestine until its carving up after the implementation of the Balfour Declaration.

Let’s get a few things straight, shall we?

First, no reasonably minded person would ever suggest that by denying members of the global Jewish diaspora the right to self-determination and a homeland the person doing so is not in some way prejudice against Jews and therefore likely to be antiSemitic.

Put simply; to do so, clearly implies that s/he does hold some form of prejudice against the Jewish diaspora.

If Jews and Israelis truly wish to counter real antiSemitism – without seeking to weaponize and misapply it – the establishment a Jewish homeland should not be at the expense of illegal land grabs and settlements under a policy of belligerent expansionism and occupation on what is essentially stolen Palestinian land should not be labelled as such because such actions are in clear breach of international law.

Moreover, no-one disputes that Jews have been persecuted and displaced for more than 2 millennia, or were persecuted by Constantine or the Nazis and Hitler. Most certainly, no-one denies that he, Hitler, authorised the slaughter and inhumane maltreatment of millions of Jews.

However, what must be accepted, is that Jews, like most other societies and communities, have also played their part in many of the World’s most horrific events; including in Russia, WWII, the Bosnian War and in the establishment and continued occupation and encroachment of Palestine.

In slavery, for example, it is entirely true to state that Nat Rothschild, whom I have already mentioned, supported and funded slavery, and fought against its abolition in order to maintain his business empire and, ultimately, his intentions to establish the State of Israel. Why? Because it is documented.

Indeed, Rothschild and business partner, August Belmont, were known adversaries against Abraham Lincoln, who, as we all know, was instrumental in abolishing slavery in the United States. In the case of abolition in the UK, it was Rothschild himself who even raised the finances to compensate slave and plantation owners after abolition.

The Rothschild family also had considerable business interests in the East India Company and was also responsible for brokering the Balfour Declaration in exchange for involving the United States in WWI and II and the establishment of Israel. Incidentally, Lord Balfour’s heir still sits on the Board of Trustees of the Rothschild Foundation, to this day.

Similarly, the fact that members of European Jewry played a significant role in establishing the modern global merchant banking and financial systems, should not be consider prejudicial toward Jews or antiSemitic either.

For example, it was members of the Jewish diaspora, who founded and oversaw the funding and investment of the Medici or the Spanish Royal Families; and subsequent establishment of European state banks, and the creation of financial havens like Guernsey, Jersey, and creation of Switzerland’s current banking institutions, like the Union Bancaire Privee.

It is not antiSemitic to state or say any of these things, as they are based on historical fact.

Equally, if you are Jewish, as my Grandfather was, you cannot stand by, screaming antiSemitism at anyone who speaks out against Israel’s apartheid and human rights abuses.

For clarity and avoidance of doubt, use of the term ‘fallacy’, in its strictest meaning and interpretation, refers only to manufacturing antiSemitism in regards to opposing the right and lawful activities to BDS and criticising human rights abuses. It does not diminish the persecution and rights of the Jewish diaspora. To say that it does, is to manufacture false claims of antiSemitism.

If you are Jewish and do this, you rightly risk being accused of dishonest and duplicitous.

As for Jewish Human Rights Watch attempts to criminalise BDS, I, for one, will not invest, or have my pension invested in any Israeli product that kills or has been produced and manufactured on occupied land and illegal settlements.

That is my unequivocal and universal right and you do the cause to rid the world of hatred, prejudices and inequality considerable harm by seeking to challenge and remove it.

You will not pass!

Author: Jason Schumann

Advertisements

The Trial of Alison Chabloz

25 May

[Blog Updated on 31 December, 2016; 21 April, 2017; and 26 May, 2018]

Screen Shot 2016-12-12 at 00.43.14.png

In the above image, from left to right, we have Ambrosine “Shittyknickers” Shitrit, Rakhel (Rachel) Dobrikova, and Gideon Falter.

We will talk about them in a moment, but let’s first touch on Alison Chabloz, their not-so innocent victim.

For avoidance of doubt, I should first make it absolutely clear, that what transpires in the following, in no way denies the suffering of the Jewish diaspora, right to self-determination, or their right to a homeland.

Alison is a British musician, whom I know well. For a time, Alison and I used to be friends. We parted company acrimoniously, due to a misunderstanding on her part. Like me, Alison is pro-Palestinian and an anti-Zionist. We are both very vocal about this on social media, which has drawn considerable abuse for us both, but Alison more so.

Our chief, self-appointed, longterm foe, and abuser, is the truly despicable and pernicious Ambrosine Shitrit.

For the record, Ambrosine is a Zionista and has harassed and targeted Alison and I, for more than 4 years. She, Ambrosine that is, is now under police investigation as a result of her crimes and continued harassment against me.

Not content with abusing online, Ambrosine has taken it upon herself as a mission to pursue Alison in every aspect of her life, intent on destroying her.

It’s worth noting here, that because of her abuse of Alison, myself and others, Ambrosine has had over 30 (yes, 30!) accounts suspended on social media platforms like Twitter.

We’ll call Ambrosine Shittyknickers from here on, because that’s how much disdain I have for the nasty Islamophobic, Fascist Grade A bitch, that she is!

Shittyknickers’ abuse of Alison began with the usual insults and trolling on Twitter, calling her a Nazi and anti-Semitic… because of Alison’s support of Muslims against the rise of Islamophobia in the UK, and her views regarding Israel’s maltreatment of Palestinians and illegal occupation of their lands.

Her abuse then took a turn and became more serious… and disturbing!

Shittyknickers became aware that Alison was working on a cruise ship and decided to take it upon herself to write an anonymous letter to her employer, informing them that Alison is anti-Semitic.

As a direct result, Alison was called into the captain’s office, sacked, and told to disembark.

She was left stranded in a foreign country, with no way to get home. I offered to step in but someone else did instead.

Shittyknickers also sends Alison anonymous presents and cards in the post. You can guess the sort of thing.

(Derbyshire police, Alison’s local force, have done absolutely zip about this abuse and harassment).

Fast forward a year or so, and Alison was performing at the Edinburgh Festival and took the opportunity to say fuck you to Shittyknickers and her many other, mainly Zionist abusers.

It was quite silly and impetuous of Alison, but she decide to do this by taking a photograph of herself outside Edinburgh Castle gesturing the Quenelle, which is a symbol that many Jews have adopted as an anti-Semitic one.

Alison then posted this photograph on social media.

Ermagherrd!

Boy was there complete butthurt and uproar — all hell broke loose!

Alison had made a rod for her back in doing this, and has come in for a hard ride ever since.

Because of Alison’s – well, stupidity, in gesturing the Quenelle – all the vultures and cockroaches came out with their pitchforks, knives and poison pens, baying for blood.

There were letters to the Edinburgh Festival organisers, blogs, newspaper articles in Jewish media and a defamatory article in the Sun by the paedo-linked, perma foot-in-mouth moron that is Louise “Stenchof” Mensch.

Like a pig in shit (pardon my candidness again!), Alison was revelling in the fact that she had stuck one up to her haters and abusers – yes, she has narcissistic tendencies!

Ruining Alison’s career, sending hate mail to her parents’ home, and smearing her in the press as an anti-Semite, just wasn’t enough for Shittyknickers. Along with the equally vile Rakhel Dobrikova, and a convicted fraudster and alleged scam artist Jasna Badzak, and professional victim Suzanne Fernandez, they all embarked on a series of false and malicious reports to the police about Alison.

(Until recently, their reports came to nothing).

In response, Alison went on the offensive. Again, stupidly – many would suggest – Alison began mocking her abusers on her Youtube channel. Alison’s ill-conceived efforts, to goad and mock her abusers briefly brought her to the attention of Mark Lewis, a Zionist Jewish Lawyer, who sent her a series of now deleted messages on Twitter, expressing his delight if she were to die.

Following recent media coverage, I was intrigued and stumbled across the lovely Rakhel (not!) actually engaged in spying on Alison’s Facebook page several days ago, presumably on a reporting mission (See below).

I challenged her and asked her purpose for being on Alison’s Facebook. She couldn’t provide an honest or straight answer. Rakhel promptly reported back to one Gideon Falter, claiming I had made offensive comments to her about members of the Jewish community.

Gideon then emailed me, making futile and ill-considered threats to me. His own stupidity has rightly gotten my back up; and so, I rightly told him to fuck off!

Here’s the wonderfully scheming and abusive Rakhel now seeking to engage a colleague of mine and harassing my work account by making idle threats for exposing her vitriol and lies. Threats, by the way, that she liberally makes to others and that have no legal basis and will never stand up in a court of law, let alone pass water.

Another one of the vengeful cabal involved in plotting against Alison is a woman by the name of Caroline Ost. You can see evidence in the following links of how determined they are to silence Alison. Here is Caroline admitting to a member of the prosecution team in the case against Alison, that she (as well as others) have made reports about her to the police.

When I say ‘silence’ Alison, what I mean is… by any means they can and at their disposal! The exact phrase used by Caroline et al, in the exchange shown in the following link, is that Alison is some kind of ’cause’ for them; or rather silencing her (and thus you and me) is ultimately their mission.

Read on. I will explain in more detail what I mean by ‘mission’.

As referenced above, into the fray comes one Gideon Falter, who is the Chair of the UK ‘so-called’ registered charity, Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA).

Because Gideon, Shittyknickers, Caroline, and the rest of their rabid cabal, were unhappy with what they say was the police failing to prosecute Alison, Gideon has brought a private prosecution against her, under s.127 of the UK’s Communication Act, 2003.

The case has been brought because of one of Alison’s songs. Yes, a satirical song about historical revisionism and a perceived sense of singular ‘privilege’ and ‘victimhood’, that is often used as a stick, to beat those who question or challenge about the head!

Yes, these abhorrent characters are this desperate to silence Alison.

You only need look here in this following exchange on social media, to see that Gideon Falter himself has conveyed a message via Caroline asking an anonymous Twitter user (and a number of other individuals) not to interfere with CAA’s efforts to silence Alison, so that they can have ‘their moment of glory’ (sic).

Yes, you read that correctly; these relentless, overbearing vultures wish to make an example of Alison (and you and me), by setting a legal precedent – via the back door – to make any questioning of historical events, or criticism of Israeli war crimes, an illegal act.

Ken Aidel (more research underway on this one), has freely and publicly stated on his Twitter account, that Gideon Falter himself has requested him or someone linked to him and CAA, to remove any mention of Alison from his Twitter feed.

Gideon even went to the extraordinary lengths to hold a special recruitment event in November, to enlist the services of legal counsel for the case. The preliminary hearing was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court, in London, on Thursday, the 15 December, 2016.

One of CAA’s fervent supporters was recently very active on social media, almost orgasming at the prospect of what he believes will be the end of Alison and (everyone else’s, for that matter) right to freedom of speech to challenge and criticise Israel and question historical events.

There are unconfirmed rumours that this ‘supporter’, who goes by the name ‘Robbersdog’ is thought to be none other than Stephen Silverman, CAA’s director of investigations and enforcement. However, what we can absolutely confirm, is that Silverman confessed in court to being behind a troll account known as @BedlamJones. He was compelled to admit this under questioning by the defence; that, or face perjury charges. Since CAA commenced its private prosecution against Alison, Silverman has been busy deleting self-incriminating tweets.

Apparently, Gideon’s case against Alison is a test case.

Needless to say, the case will likely and ultimately fail, as Gideon’s claim is legally misconceived, and amounts to an outrageous abuse of the law and court process.

Some of you reading this will be unaware, but very similar vexatious and frivolous efforts, by Jewish Human Rights Watch, also failed and were rightly thrown out for the same reason.

If, by some miraculous act of the Lard, Alison is found guilty, the UK can kiss good-bye to freedom of speech — no thanks to the Zionist lobby that operates with the apparent sanction of the government in the UK.

Note: Almost everyone in this blog is Jewish, adding credence to the view – that Jews, in general – have an issue with being mocked or challenged on their views, historical events we are ‘told’ to accept as incontrovertible fact, or Israel’s war crimes. It’s a kind of profound form of a persecution complex that brings out the worst in some people.

It also suggests that (((they))) and their subordinates and collaborators, will use any means necessary (and) at their disposal, to influence and/ or bend the law to their will; to target, silence, and ruin anyone with whom they disagree or whom questions their precious claim to special victim status.

Indeed, it’s all part of the psychosis of Jewish victimhood and perceived sense of divine privilege, as the “Chosenites”.

This vindictive and malevolent behaviour, of seeking to destroy someone, is a perfect example of how morally bankrupt and psychopathic some of these people are.

If you are in any doubt about what I am saying here, just take a look at this website: http://izionist.org

If we all sit or stand on our ‘not me’ laurels, in silence, failing to challenge them and speak out, we are part of the problem, which means we are all fucked! By which, I mean the whole of humanity. We need to organise to fight them!

Because I will not be silenced I am now a target and have been threatened by CAA. I am also being harassed by its volunteers and supporters who have attempted to hack my Facebook account, launched a failed cyber attack on my website, and abuse me online with obscenities about my HIV status and ethnicity, as well as setting up fake social media accounts in my name.

If you read this, Gideon, despite the fact that I disagree with Alison’s methods and many of her views, because of your recent threats to me and subversive efforts to misuse the law to push a wider agenda; be mindful that I haven’t finished with you or CAA yet, so watch this space. I promise you it will not end well!

Update:

  1. Alison was granted unconditional bail; the case adjourned until March 2017. An application to Strike Out was dismissed.
  2. Two days before Christmas day, Alison was again dragged before the court. This time she has effectively been banned from all social media until after her trial.
  3. Jonathan Hoffman, a prominent member of the UK Jewry and a former Bank of England official claims that he spoke with one of the Magistrate’s at Alison’s hearing and is consequently able to confirm she will likely be given a fine. Note: This has now been reported to the police and the court.
  4. Click here for a clear example of the level of conceit and malice of Ambrosine “Shittyknickers” Shitrit.
  5. Note: Ambrosine, this blog ain’t ever coming down. Not even by a court order. Try me.
  6. Shittyknickers now claiming that I have a police warning for calling her Shittyknickers. In short, it is a lie and she is in for a big shock very soon. I will post a new blog once everything is confirmed.
  7. Alison has recently been informed by the police that the malicious charges brought against her by those she refers to as ‘the Fishwives‘ have been dropped. Presumably because the charges were indeed malicious. No doubt the fishwives will be frothing with oodles of major butthurt. Such tears are truly delicious.
  8. Alison was convicted of causing gross offence on the 25 May, 2018. Sadly, she made a rod for her own back, by lowering herself and allowing her stalkers to goad her into becoming extreme in her views and depictions of them. See the following screenshot as evidence of the goading that led to her prosecution.
  9. In one comment to the above screenshot – the poster of the tweet, who, until today was an anonymous troll, but is now known as Mordechai Getz – was thanked for his unrelenting harassment of Alison. In reply, his response to attribute his pathological behaviour and that of “1000s of others”, to the uber troll and Islamophobic Andrea Goncalves Da Silva.
  10. You can now understand from the above image alone, that when someone is repeatedly harassed and abuse they would either recoil or seek to challenge or mock their abusers.

Regards,

Jason Schumann

Legal Disclaimer:

All comments, images, and other information posted in this blog, are in the public domain and believed to be a matter of public record. I, Jason Schumann, assert and believe the contents herein, have been posted in good faith, in the belief that they are true and not in any way specious or false.

Special Note:

I have backed up my blogs and archived all links provided in the above post.

Campaign Against AntiSemitism: Fake Charity Embroiled in Allegations to Pervert the Course of Justice

30 Oct

[Published 30 October, 2017]

hardyal-dhindsa-bcca-visit

In December 2016, the so-called Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA) launched a private prosecution against the British musician, Alison Chabloz.

For some background on the case, you can read more HERE and also HERE.

In preparation, CAA held a special recruitment evening to enlist the services of a group of Jewish lawyers providing their services pro bono to prosecute her.

As part of its claim, CAA contends that Chabloz breached the Malicious Communications Act by publishing songs that are or likely to be offensive to and mock the suffering of Jews.

As I have previously written, Chabloz was foolish in publishing her songs, but only did so after being relentlessly harassed for a number of years by a group of vicious Zionist trolls.

Before I felt it necessary to acrimoniously part ways with Chabloz, I remember telling her that she was playing into her abusers’ hands and making a rod for her own back.

That said, I dare say anyone else in a similar position and on the receiving end of such unrelenting abuse and harassment would have reacted similarly.

With the exception of one of the individuals, three of these trolls, are all Jewish women, who attempted but failed to have harassment charges brought against Chabloz.

After CAA brought its private prosecution and more detail came to light, its officers and representatives successfully petitioned the Crown Prosecution Service to take over the case as a criminal matter.

Another of Chabloz’s trolls is one Stephen Silverman, who went under the usernames @Bedlamjones and @Maxwellssiver1 on social media.

Silverman was forced to admit his trolling activity of Chabloz at one of the preliminary hearings in preparation for her trial, under cross examination with the penalty of perjury had he denied doing so.

When this came to light, and purely on the basis of avoiding recriminations, Silverman and those working with him in this targeted campaign, promptly deleted the entire contents of the Twitter feed for both accounts, including that of several other accounts involved in trolling Chabloz and others.

For information, Silverman is in fact employed by CAA, as its director of prosecutions. It’s as if he was purposely stalking and harassing Chabloz to lay the ground to prosecute her.

His accomplice was another staff member of CAA, named Binyomin Gilbert.

In another eye-opener, the former director of the Zionist Federation and a retired Bank of England official, Jonathan Hoffman, let it be known on social media, that he himself had a conversation with one of the magistrates at Chabloz’s initial hearing and was assured that she would be found guilty and given a possible fine.

In a subsequent hearing, listed and heard before a judge in the beginning of 2017, Baroness Arbuthnot was forced to recuse herself as a magistrate from the trial after further incriminating information and revelations came to light.

Fast-forward to the last couple of months and Chabloz drops another eye-opening nugget, alleging that Jonathan Hoffman sent an email to the court for the attention of the pre-trial judge, asking him to look favourably on prosecuting her.

A redacted copy of the email was handed to her by Judge John Zani.

For the record, Hoffman has confirmed links with Paul Besser, a member of the far-right group, Britain First. Although there is clear evidence of his associations with Besser – both of whom have been photographed together – associations with other members of the far-right are as yet unconfirmed.

On his possible but thus far unconfirmed other far-right associations, Hoffman has refused all requests to confirm or deny knowing or having met with Kevin Wilshaw, an ex-member of the National Front and British National Party, who recently came out as gay and let it be known that he is in fact Jewish.

If you can’t categorically deny it, say nothing, eh, Hoffman?

Because of Hoffman’s efforts to wilfully attempt to pervert the course of justice and deprive Chabloz of the right to a fair trial, the court ruled in the most recent hearing that he was an unreliable and unfit witness.

At this same hearing, Silverman and Gideon Falter, founder of CAA, both failed to attend. Nonetheless, they sought, via the Crown Prosecution Service, to impose tighter restrictions upon Chabloz, after learning that the police had given her back her laptop with all its contents.

CAA’s restriction requests until the trial date were refused, but presumably Falter and Silverman sought to have them imposed in order to prevent Chabloz from publishing material that may possibly be incriminating against them.

For the grace of goodness and justice, I rejoice in the fact that they failed.

In another turn of events, CAA recently published an image of meeting with Hardyal Dhindsa, who is the Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire Police.

It is certainly by no coincidence, that Derbyshire Police just happens to be the constabulary for the county in which Chabloz currently resides.

In the same publication as the image, CAA was kind enough to confirm that its staff discussed examples of alleged antiSemitism with Dhindsa, including those alleged against Chabloz.

The Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner’s Office has since been sent a Freedom of Information Request regarding this meeting – as has the Metropolitan Police – regarding a new crime initiative set up by CAA and the Jewish Police Association.

[The Freedom of information Request submitted has since confirmed, that CAA sought the influence of Dhindsa and Derbyshire Police in the outcome of the trial and also offered to write an Op-Ed on his behalf on the subject of antiSemitism] ~ Updated on the 25 May, 2018.

For information, there is also a formal complaint against CAA, which is currently under investigation by the Charity Commission, and there is a petition HERE to have CAA’s charitable status removed.

It has also been confirmed that investigations are taking place regarding Hoffman.

CAA is not a bona-fide charity as it claims, but an instrument of the apartheid state of Israel that needs to be shut down.

Free speech is at peril until we do.

Author: Jason Schumann

Update:

  1. Alison was convicted of causing gross offence on the 25 May, 2018.
  2. Sadly, she made a rod for her own back, by lowering herself and allowing her stalkers to goad her into becoming extreme in her views and depictions of them.
  3. See the following screenshot as evidence of the goading that led to her prosecution.
  4. In reply to several congratulatory reply comments, Mordechai’s response to attribute his pathological behaviour and that of “1000s of others”, to the uber troll and Islamophobic Andrea Goncalves Da Silva. Andrea, aka @_andreaurbanfox, liked his comment.
  5. Mordechai Getz in fact chose to remain an anonymous troll and only crept out from his rock after Judge Zani announced his ruling.
  6. Although Alison Chabloz’s antiSemitic views are now clear, perhaps one can now understand – if only from the evidence of the systematic harassment admitted to in above image alone, how she came to be antiSemitic and, that when someone is repeatedly harassed and abused – they will either recoil and likely suffer a mental breakdown; or retaliate, by seeking to challenge and/ or mock their abusers.
  7. If it were not for the incessant abuse and harassment instigated by the likes of vermin like Mordechai Getz and; initially, by the likes of Andrea Goncalves Da Silva and Ambrosine Shitrit, perhaps Alison would not have posted the material that she did that led to her prosecution.

Legal Disclaimer:

All comments, images, and other information posted in this blog, are in the public domain and believed to be a matter of public record. I, Jason Schumann, assert and believe the contents herein, have been posted in good faith, in the belief that they are true and not in any way specious or false.

Special Note:

I have backed up my blogs and archived all links provided in the above post. It will NOT ever be removed or taken down.

It will NOT ever be removed or taken down.

Bob Blackman: British MP Unapologetic About Links to antiMuslim Hindu and English Nationalists

28 Oct

[Published 28 October, 2017]

Tory_MP_Bob_Blackman_Hosts_Anti_Muslim_Hindu_Extremist_in_UK_Parliament_1

Bob Blackman, a Tory MP and patron of the Campaign Against AntiSemitism, recently hosted a Diwali celebration event in the UK’s House of Commons with extremist, Tapan Ghosh.

The event was also attended by Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, who issued an immediate apology.

Ghosh, a Hindu Nationalist, has previously called for the genocide of Muslims in Kashmir, as well as praising the forced displacement and ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Myanmar.

Ghosh, also founder of the Hindu Defence League, has also been praised by former English Defence League founder, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who is more well-known by the name, Tommy Robinson.

Did Blackman apologise or distance himself from Ghosh?

Answer: No.

In response to questions and criticism of attending an event and meeting with Ghosh, and despite having organised it, Blackman shrugged it off, simply saying he was not aware of who was invited and did not see what all the fuss was about.

In a statement, he gave to the press, he also defended Ghosh, stating that his presence was relevant to the event taking place. Blackman did state that he would have challenged Ghosh had he made any similar comments but that free speech was paramount.

However, it now transpires, that Blackman is also associated with Robinson, having interacted with him and apparently shown agreement with his views on social media. In one such interaction, Blackman retweeted a tweet in which Robinson states that Hindus in Bangladesh are surrounded by Muslims.

What neither Blackman nor Robinson seem to have grasped is that it was the brutalism of British colonialism and policy of divide and rule, which has created and exacerbated religious tensions and the unequal religious makeup of Bangladeshi society; first after the partition of India and then, when Bangladesh became its own country after civil war with and separation from Pakistan.

Blackman and Robinson also seem to ignore nor the fact that it is Bangladesh which is bearing the brunt of the ongoing refugee crisis of the Rahimyar Muslims – who are being driven out of Rakhine and over the border by the Myanmar government – which is arguably adding to the tensions and religious divide.

Blackman’s links with and apparently ardent support for Hindus does not go unmissed or without some questioning as to where his loyalties may lie.

A quick view of Blackman’s expenses, shows that he was paid several hundred pounds to attend an anti-Iran event organized by the National Council of Resistance of Iran and the Welle Association, which supports and explicitly promotes regime change in Iran.

In addition, he also receives regular donations from two Hindu businessmen; a significant donation received from the former hedge fund manager, Lord Fink for undisclosed remunerations; and a donation from a property company to attend a conference in Israel.

There is an even larger donation received from the Indian High Commission.

India, incidentally, conspired with Bengali and Hindu Nationalists, for the civil war that brought about the creation and establishment of Bangladesh, which was also funded and supported by Israel and British governments.

Not directly, but by repeatedly ‘liking’ and ‘retweeting’ criticism and hatred toward Muslims, Blackman, indirectly, shows himself for who he really is and who he supports.

Rajnish Kashyap, Director of the Hindu Council of Britain, was asked to comment and condemn the invitation of Ghosh to the House of Commons event hosted by Blackman, but has failed to respond.

And, whilst the Campaign Against AntiSemitism maliciously and wrongly accuses the European Forum for Ethnic Minority Individuals, Communities, Individuals, and Organizations of creating tension between Sikhs and Muslims, it has so far refused to remove Blackman as its patron.

All the while, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, has recently called for the Palestine Solidarity Campaign to remove as a patron and disassociate itself from the Jewish comedian, Alexi Sayle, following an interview with Sky News in which he claimed that all allegations of antisemitism “amongst supporters of Jeremy Corbyn are a complete fabrication.”

Presumably, Blackman remains as a patron of the fake charity, Campaign Against AntiSemitism because of his support and associations with and for Hindu Nationalists against Muslims, which, naturally, serves Israel’s interests best.

Watch this space for the Campaign Against AntiSemitism to come back with a smear, making false accusations of antiSemitism.

Sadly, it would appear that Muslims are now under attack from all sides of the fascistic spectrum.

Since publishing this blog, Blackman has sadly blocked on Twitter.

Author: Jason Schumann

A Person of Interest: Trolls, Zionists, and Others

23 Oct

[Published 23 October, 2017]

Over the years, my blog and social media posts have amassed a certain amount of interest.

My followership and those whom take an interest in what I blog or post about can be broken down into four different types.

First, we have those who often share an interest of what I post, whom I would term likeminded and woke individuals, who actually give a damn about the world in which we live. Even if just on one particular subject or topic that I comment on or blog about.

The second group, whom I refer to as ‘specimens’, are the obsessive and pathetic trolls that lurk under the dark rocks and in corners of what has become antisocial media, who appear to have nothing better to do than spy on me every day.

You could call this group my deranged fans, of sorts.

Someone I no longer associate with calls them the ‘fish wives.’ This group hiss, backbite and form little armies in an effort to somehow bring about my demise.

Delusion, I know.

They’re never successful at it though; I am always ready for them and have others who look out for me and tip me off about their plans.

Yes, it’s actually that lame that there are those who have to keep a look out for me because these pernicious trogs and specimens simply won’t move on.

Someone in particular has been paying a few keyword searches on my blog, repeatedly.

The third group is a group of hardcore Zionists, who just love to scream and yell “ANTISEMITE”, at anyone who is critical of Israel or questions the perpetual victimhood of the Jewish diaspora.

Don’t get me wrong, historically, Jews have indeed suffered immensely and I do not nor would I ever seek to diminish that. Only seeking to point out the hypocrisy when it comes to Israel’s maltreatment of Palestinians and others.

The most pernicious of this group like to write blogs about me, to discredit and smear, which is what they do.

The last group who seem to avidly follow me are the private and state actors; you know, like the ones who recently placed a bomb under the car of the Maltese journalist, for example.

These are perhaps the worst of my stalkers. The one’s who do not like me poking into or exposing their business practices and corruption.

These are the one’s whose human rights abuses, business and other affairs I look into and expose.

I dare say I have cost them a fair packet in fees after spooking them into moving their cash around to different offshore accounts.

You can see here who they are.

Screen Shot 2017-10-23 at 22.14.21

Now ask yourself: Why would a company like Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu search a blog specifically on the subjects of the Israeli Lobby or money laundering? Add to that Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs conducting the same search less than 12 hours prior? And how did either of them come across my blog?

In addition, how on earth would the US Department for Defense have come across or been alerted to my blog?

Interestingly in the case of the former, the Paradise Papers have just been released and it is public knowledge that I have exposed and lodged official complaints regarding tax avoidance, offshore accounts, and money laundering.

Anyhow, troll, stalker, whatever, we know where to look and who to blame if anything should happen to me.

Oh, and take a seat whilst waiting for me to give a fuck.

Author: Jason Schumann

Agent Provocateurs: Silencing Freedom of Speech, Zionist Infiltrators, and Faux Claims of Anti-Semitism

14 Sep

[Published 12 September, 2017]

Screen Shot 2017-09-14 at 17.27.38.png

[Image available via the interwebz]

In the above image you will see Stephen Silverman, whom many refer to as “Slitherman” and “the Enforcer”. I will explain why and the relevance of including him in this blog in a moment.

First, let’s do an explainer as to why I wrote this blog about him and other likeminded, nefarious individuals.

This blog came about due to an orchestrated altercation to disrupt a pro-Palestinian event, held on Coventry, UK, less than a week ago.

The keynote speaker was MK Haneen Zoabi, a Palestinian and member of Israel’s Knesset; or parliament, if you like.

The event was organised by the West Midlands Palestine Solidarity Campaign with pro-Palestinian Human Rights Activist, Sarah Wilkinson.

The event was a public event but was unfortunately infiltrated by several Zionists agitators; including Alan Blumenthal, who is a member of the UK Independence Party and his sister, Mandy (Dingle) Blumenthal.

IMG_20170910_141931.jpg

(No offence intended to the actress who plays the character, Mandy Dingle in a longstanding British soap)!

Alan and Mandy were attending in a reporting capacity – intending to be disruptive and to feedback to their fellow Zionists – and began filming at the event.

No consent was obtained or requested by Alan and Mandy to film. They were initially allowed to film, but both were shouting at Haneen Zoabi saying: “everything you’re saying is absolute rubbish… you’re a liar.. you’re inciting.. you’re supporting terrorism.”

They left their seats several times to come closer to Zoabi and were repeatedly asked to return to their seats. Both refused to comply; and so, Sarah Wilkinson stood between them and Zoabi but in the moment hastily and, in my own opinion, wrongly snatched the device they were using to film.

You can see HERE that Alan Blumenthal became extremely violent, punching several individuals who were attempting to restrain him whilst waiting for the police to arrive. Blumenthal is also alleged to have kicked Sarah Wilkinson whilst she lay on the floor.

Mandy can be seen refusing to leave and is shouting most of the abuse, calling Zoabi a “racist bitch.” Interestingly, Mandy recently had her 5 minutes of fame in the media, claiming that the leader of the UK Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn was antiSemitic and that she was considering leaving the UK for Israel – albeit within the next 5 years or so.

(If that bad, why not leave right away, Mandy? You can only serve one master, as they say).

As with other pro-Palestinian events, like the recent PalExpo event, it is quite usual for Zionists and Jews, like David Collier and Jonathan Hoffman to covertly gain entry in order to provoke, heckle, and make claims of antiSemitism.

In a recent tweet posted by Mandy, she confirmed that she had attended events held by the firebrand, persona non grata, British politician George Galloway, claiming that she had been there and done that (sic).

When challenged on the matter, Mandy responded, classically, with faux claims of hatred towards Jews, saying that what was filmed and her reasons for being present at the event under deception as a provocateur, was in fact ‘Pallywood’, implying that it was manufactured to even suggest it.

In the case of Stephen Silverman, who is the ‘director of enforcement and prosecutions’ for the nefarious Campaign Against Antisemitism, when the European Forum for Ethnic Minorities (EFEMICO) tweeted a message of support to Sarah Wilkinson, asking if she had come out unscathed and commenting on the deception and actions of Alan Blumenthal who assaulted her, Silverman’s response was to also make faux claims of antiSemitism.

EFEMICO responded to Silverman, stating that criticism of an apartheid regime, such as Israel is, like any other other country guilty of crimes against humanity, is in no way racist. Silverman was also reminded that no one is entitled to use and abuse their religion or ethnicity to counter valid criticism of a State’s human rights abuses. His response was typical and dismissive, as is the default response of any individual with a similar sense of persecution complex as have many members of the World Jewry.

Perhaps somewhat understandably, the following image explains perfectly why so many Jews are so defensive and pernicious in the defence of Israel:

Screen Shot 2017-07-19 at 16.27.14

This view is not to diminish the persecution of the Jewish diaspora; the realities of which forever emblazoned in our memories and should never occur in our shared histories ever again. That said, the suffering and persecution of Jews in the last century is now used as a stick with which to beat non-Jews over the head or to smear and demonize anyone who is critical of Israel or Judaism.

As indicated in the above quote from the United States Peace Institute, the collective trauma of Jewish suffering has made the World Jewry overly hyper-vigilant, extremely defensive, and generally intolerant to any kind of criticism.

This, in part, is why many pro-Israeli and/ or Zionist Jews will go out their way, by any means necessary, to discredit and silence anyone who is critical of them, and why many non-Jews believe that members of the Jewish community are generally duplicitous and pernicious in many ways.

This sensitivity is why Alan and Mandy Blumenthal did what they did and reacted in the way they did when confronted. Again, it’s also why Stephen Silverman responded the way he did.

Ask yourself these two questions:

1. Why would anyone infiltrate and record an event on a subject to which they are fundamentally opposed and then decry false claims of antiSemitism when exposed? Or;

2. Make false claims of hatred toward Jews when it’s the State of Israel that is being criticised and not Jews themselves?

Incidentally, Silverman has since deleted his tweets to EFEMICO, but not before they were archived and uploaded to a third party website.

Purely and simply, what the Blumenthals did was devious, wrong, and the brother’s violent response was a base response to a non-existent threat in a situation that he and his sister created, when neither he nor his sister should have been present at the event in the first place, and should have removed themselves immediately and without any fuss when asked.

Silverman’s response to EFEMICO was a pernicious smear, compounded by the fact that he was expecting a cutting response – and further, by the fact that he removed his tweets soliciting the response – so as to imply that EFEMICO was the aggressor, when this was clearly not the case.

This is not the first time Silverman has behaved this way. In his capacity for the Campaign Against AntiSemitism, he frequently threatens people and venues by letter and email and is a known harasser of two women on social media, having set up several troll accounts to abuse them, which he was forced to admit in court under penalty of perjury.

As was once said in a radio interview by a former Israeli Minister, referring to unfounded and mendacious smears of antiSemitism: “It’s a trick we use… we always use it.”

If it’s not acceptable for People of Colour to play the ‘race card’, so-to-speak; or Muslims to claim Islamophobia regarding criticism of patriarchal interpretations and indoctrination of Islam, then neither is it acceptable for the Jewish community to incessantly make false claims of antiSemitism.

One can only hope that one day, Jews learn to accept valid criticism (of themselves and Israel) instead of trying silence critics and outlaw it.

This attack dog approach, exceptionalism, and victim mentality, is counterproductive and extremely tedious, to which the many are now waking up to and will no longer tolerate.

Author: Jason Schumann

Update – 22 September, 2017

After reading this blog, Mandy Blumenthal took umbrage and tweeted that the contents was lies and libel.

Her tweet was favourited by her partner, Mark Lewis, a libel lawyer for the firm Seddons, who is also legal counsel for the Israeli government, in combatting the BDS movement.

Presumably Mark – with whom I have some history and once suggested that I should be given a one way ticket to the Middle East, to be thrown off a building for being gay – thought somehow, that he was going to intimidate me.

No such luck, Mark!

As with the video footage available, corroborated evidence from various sources, and the above screenshot shows, Mandy and Alan were violent and did scream insults and abuse at MK Zoabi.

So, Mark, if you care to try and sue me, bring it!

[Legal disclaimer removed, as everything quoted in this blog is a matter of record].

UK Home Office: Hate Crimes, Jewish Exceptionalism, and Inequality Under the Law

17 Jul

[Published 17 July, 2017, Updated 25 July, 2017]

In late 2015, the UK Government announced a £13.4m grant of taxpayers money, to fund the work of the Community Security Trust (CST), “for security measures, including security guards, at Jewish independent and state schools, colleges and nurseries, synagogues and other community sites, and will be managed by CST.”

CST, calls itself ‘the UK’s security and hate crimes monitoring organisation for members of the British Jewish community.’ It was founded by the prolific and corrupt, money-laundering and tax avoiding, property investment and business entrepreneur, Gerald Maurice Ronson, CBE.

The announcement of the grant, was made by then Prime Minister, David Cameron – a grant that was facilitated by Sir Eric Pickles, the former Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government – whose most recent roles include; being a paid advisor to CST for ‘undisclosed activities’; the Chair of the Conservative Friends of Israel; and now a government role as the ‘Special Envoy to Israel.’

cameron.jpeg

The grant was briefly put on hold, until Cameron left public office – to avoid exposure of his business and financial dealings, but reaffirmed by the former Home Secretary and now current Prime Minister, Theresa May, in March 2016 – at a fundraising gala dinner, organised by CST and sponsored by Deloitte.

Home-Secretary-Theresa-May-at-the-CST-dinner-with-Gerald-Ronson-and-Chief-Rabbi-Ephraim-Mirvis

In March 2017, at the same fundraising gala attended by May, the current Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, also reaffirmed: “We [the Government] will be continuing the funding of the Jewish community protective security grant… for 2017 to 2018.” Adding that she, [Rudd], believed that there is, or was, a ‘significant’ jihadi threat to their [Jewish] safety in the UK.

C56TLrPWMAAB2TA.jpg

The remote possibility of a jihadi ‘threat’ [against British Jews] is exactly that… it is pure fantasy, that was purposely orchestrated and amplified by CST itself. It is, of course, a completely unfounded, fabrication and nonsense! The purpose of which, is to maintain the notion of Jewish privilege and exceptionalism as Chosenites.

As evidence of which, one only need take a look at Hansard, on CST’s own website, and its Twitter account. In particular, CST’s recent misleading reporting of hoax bomb threats to British Jewish schools and institutions.

As this story unfolded, the truth of the matter was, that these bomb threats were actually made by an Israeli, using “sophisticated technology”, to hide and maintain his anonymity.

He made in excess of 2000 hoax bomb threat phone calls before being caught, in at least 10 countries. Rather than admit any facts, the Israeli Government have declared him ‘mentally ill’, than admit any involvement or wrongdoing.

Prior to his identification and capture by US authorities, in January 2017, CST posted: “27 Jewish centres in the USA evacuated after bomb threats; Last week CST dealt with several threats to Jewish schools.” On several occasions, over the same period, CST also, wrongly, blamed a Black man for these same hoax bomb threats against the global Jewish community.

Aside, although the threat of experiencing acts of Jew hatred may well have increased in recent years, there is absolutely no existential threat of an act of terrorism, against British Jews, on British soil, that warrants such favouritism by the British Government, over and above the threat of such an attack, or act of hatred and abuse, experienced by any other minority religious or ethnic group in the UK!

It is a complete and utter manipulation and deception by CST, to even suggest that there is!

Again, as the evidence bears out, hate crimes towards British Jews have actually decreased overall and are far less violent, whereas abuse in general and violent attacks against members of BAME communities, refugees, and LGBTI+ communities have significantly increased. 

The fact of the matter is, that in capitulating to CST’s deliberately false and pervasive narrative, of an ‘imminent [Jihadi] attack’ on British Jews, the UK government has wilfully ignored the more prevalent and increasing abuse and hatred toward other, equally, if not more deserving, minority communities.

Without doubt, the grant, of £13.4 million, given to CST – has been given without due regard to any proper assessment, accountability, or consideration of the greater need of any other minority groups – experiencing a more significant issue of abuse and hatred.

The Home Office has thus far refused all requests to disclose any information with regard to how the grant was solicited, by whom, any audit trail or required documentation, monitoring and evaluation, breakdown of expenditure, purpose or outcomes.

If one considers the official government and police data [on increases in hate crimes], on which groups – are most likely to be subjected to abuse, attacks, and hatred, or similar threats – members of the British Jewry are at the bottom of the scale, yet receive greater privilege and favouritism more than any other groups.

What have these other groups – who are indeed statistically and evidentially in greater need – in regard to provision, support, and intervention been given or provided with?

The answer, is merely ‘access’ to a small portion of a £1 million funding pot. That British Jews should receive more support from the UK Government, than the murdered members of the LGBTI+ community; Muslims who have been subjected to acid attacks and run over outside mosque for prayers; or refugees and immigrants relentlessly abused murdered in the streets?

In favouring CST, over other groups monitoring and challenging hatred and abuse, all that the UK government has done, is dismiss the rights of those in greater need, and pander to the view of Jewish victimhood and exceptionalism, which works to ferment and increasing resentment of Jews in general. 

As it stands, the fact that CST is the sole recipient of such a significant grant goes against all current British laws and principles and values for fairness and equality under the law.

Update:

Since publishing this blog article, it has been visited more than a 1000 times.

The locations of visitors reading this article; including Jersey, Ireland, Switzerland, Hong Kong, and Oman, and spidered content aggregation by the NewsCorp-owned, business and financial aggregate website, factiva.com.

Interestingly, all the locations mentioned in this update, can be traced to Gerald Maurice Ronson’s worldwide business associates, investors, and partners.

Author: Jason Schumann

Notes to Editors:

1. Gerald Maurice Ronson is a convicted fraudster and has since been awarded a CBE, by the Queen of England and Common Wealth, at the behest of certain members of the British Government and establishment.

2. Ronson, is listed as a founding director of approximately 138 companies registered at both CST’s offices in Hendon and from his personal office in the City of London.

3. Ronson’s companies and business empire, are largely run through a series of shell, holding, and dormant companies, that are traceable to a single company registered  in Jersey, for tax purposes.

4. The company responsible for Ronson’s empire is RONTEC GROUP (JERSEY) LIMITED, which lists one of its directors as Union Bancaire Privee.

5. Union Bancaire Privee is registered in Switzerland and is protected under Swiss tax and privacy laws.

6. Union Bancaire Privee and its employees also have financial investments and tax avoidance dealings with the UK, US, and Israel.

7. Union Bancaire Privee has, on several occasions, successfully been prosecuted and implicated in money laundering, manipulation of financial markets, and tax avoidance in the Bahamas, including its role in the Madoff scandal.

8. CST itself has previously been accused of acting as an instrument to promote Israeli propaganda and has been instrumental in shaping and forming UK Government policy on the criminalisation of criticism of Israel as being anti-Semitic.

9. CST also lists several shell/ dormant companies dealing with its financial activities in order to avoid tax via Jersey and Switzerland.

10. David Cameron stepped down as PM in order to avoid an audit and disclosure of his business dealings, investments, and private donations.

11. Sir Eric Pickles has previously been on the payroll of CST but has refused to disclose any payments or details of the work carried out on its behalf.

12. Theresa May is a former financial advisor to corporate finance, having given advice to companies and private individuals on tax avoidance.

13. Amber Rudd has had several bankrupt and dissolved companies and several of her business partners have previously been prosecuted for financial crimes.

Stephen Silverman and the Sickness of Jewish Privilege – Grenfell Towers Fire

16 Jun

[Published 16 June, 2017] 

Stephen-Silverman

[Image source: HERE]

In recent months, I’ve posted several blogs concerning Zionism, Jewish privilege and victimhood, and the Israeli Lobby; so, the last I want to do – following the fire that engulfed Grenfell Towers, which has resulted in the needless loss of in excess of more than 100 lives – is write a blog about a Zionist and prominent member of the UK Jewry, who unwisely thought it wise to make light of the tragedy, by shamelessly seeking to point score against one of his perceived enemies.

Now, please don’t get me wrong on this. Like any human being, I am the first to admit, that I have occasionally taken a swipe at, and derived amusement and satisfaction, from seeing those whom I have reason to dislike, get their comeuppance, so-to-speak.

However, the last thing I would ever do, is seek to derive pleasure from their death, an injury, or suffering. Neither would I intentionally or otherwise, seek to trivialise and weaponise a tragedy such as the Grenfell Towers fire, and certainly never in order influence someone else’s opinion, belittle, or express a particular repulsion or dislike for someone.

In this case, Stephen Silverman, aka Mr. Slitherman, aka @bedlamjones, and the ‘enforcer’, who is the ‘Director of Prosecutions and Investigations’, for a so-called nefarious fake charity, Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), sought to denigrate Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the UK Labour party, purely to further the Jewish cause of perpetual victimhood and the Jewish communities’ general dislike for him, because of his peaceful stance in the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict.

For those that do not know, Slitherman is a known harasser of women on social media, which he was recently forced to admit in open court, at Westminster Magistrates, in December 2016, in what has turned out to be a failed and misconceived attempt by CAA, to criminalise valid criticism of Israel’s war crimes and human rights abuses. The case was sponsored by the Israeli government itself and has since been dropped.

In a now deleted post on Twitter, Slitherman’s cheap and – quite frankly, what can only be described as a despicable pot-shot – claimed that Corbyn’s proposals to support the Grenfell Towers survivors – who are now homeless and the families of victims of the fire – was “a grotesque, self-serving cynicism.”

IMG_pqo4qd.jpg

Slitherman posted this comment in the wake of the fire and Corbyn’s condemnation of Theresa May’s inaction and alleged coverup of the tragedy.

The condemnation, concerning May’s unwillingness to meet residents; that her government purposely sat on a fire safety report, that could have prevented this tragedy had the report’s recommendations been implemented; and the suspicion and concern that her government is micromanaging the aftermath of the tragedy, including withholding details on the total number of deaths.

What Slitherman was referring to, when posting what he did, were Corbyn’s subsequent comments in Parliament and, unlike May’s refusal to do so, his willingness to visit local residents, as if he was conducting a public relations exercise.

Anyone who knows Corbyn, knows that this is simply not so and utterly outrageous to even suggest it.

One individual, who commented on the post, also suggested that Slitherman was attempting to smear Corbyn with a wrongly attributed quote that was actually made by Winston Churchill. The quote concerned the requisitioning privately owned property, to rehouse people who were made homeless after WWII. It was the reviled Daily Mail that published Churchill’s quote as Corbyn’s. Slitherman, either knowingly or otherwise, was repeating the smear in order to compound it.

Screen Shot 2017-06-17 at 17.46.58.png

For absolute clarity, the quote in question – was, in fact – made by Churchill.

Before deleting his callous and mendacious smear of Corbyn, however – which was not his first, and which he only did… after it was pointed out him how despicable it was – Slitherman’s post had 16 retweets, 20 favourites, and various follow-up posts by those in apparent like-minded awareness and agreement with his intentions in posting what he did.

For the record, I, myself, have been on the receiving end of Slitherman’s bile, and it was not pleasant. Clearly, the only person guilty of being “grotesque” and of “self-serving cynicism” here, is Slitherman himself.

It truly despairs and pains me to say this – but Slitherman, like so many other Zionists and anti-Corbynites – are truly pernicious and resentful specimens, who will use any means at their disposal to discredit their self-created enemies.

As a closer to this blog, it is also worth noting, that 72 members of May’s government are landlords of private and/ or social housing – all of whom, voted against and filibustered a proposal by Corbyn – to recommend installation of sprinkler systems in all or most high-rise residential buildings.

A proposal that – had it  been passed – could have prevented the deaths of the victims in the Grenfell Towers fire.

Perhaps Slitherman should consider “whispering” more quietly next time!

Author: Jason Schumann

Zionist Lobby: Tim Farron, Liberal Democrats Party Leader, and the Sacking of David Ward, MP

27 Apr

[Published May 2017]

 

On the 26 April, 2017, Tim Farron, leader of the UK Liberal Democrats, announced on Twitter that he had ‘sacked’ David Ward from the party.

Initially, Farron was reported as having stated that he was unable to intervene in local party politics or selection processes. Ward was to stand for election in the parliamentary seat of Bradford East on the 08 June, 2017.

However, after pressure from Sir Eric Pickles, the UK’s Special Envoy to Israel and Chair of Conservative Friends of Israel, and the ‘behind-the-scenes’ intervention of the nefarious and meddling Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), Farron decided to do an extraordinary u-turn, calling Ward ‘unfit to stand and represent the Party.

Ward is known to be very critical of the apartheid state of Israel and his comments have been somewhat hard-hitting and possibly unpleasant to some sensitive ears. For example, the year before Israel’s Protective Edge slaughtered more than 2,400 Palestinian including 500 children with the illegal use of White Phosphorus, Ward said:

“Am I wrong or are am I right? At long last the Zionists are losing the battle – how long can the apartheid State of Israel last?”

 

Prior to Farron’s u-turn on the matter, Mark Wallace, editor of Conservative Home, called his decision not to sack Ward “bullshit”. Not content with attacking Farron, Wallace then went on a tirade of abuse aimed at Ward, saying: “maybe fuck-off now, you weapons-grade scumbag” and posting a link to his blog about him.

Sadly, Wallace is under some illusion (a spell or cognitive dissonance?) and claims Ward’s comments about the insidiousness of Zionism, the Lobby, and Israel’s persistent Human Rights abuses amount to racism.

Possibly knowing that he or a colleague would be attending a meeting with the Liberal Democrats to discuss Ward, Stephen “Slitherman” Silverman, director of prosecutions and investigations for CAA, and a known harasser of women, was on hand to comment on Wallace’s abuse, suggesting he already knew what would happen to Ward.

Screen Shot 2017-04-27 at 15.25.58.png

 

Slitherman and CAA also enlisted the assistance of Martin Greig, a Liberal Democrat councillor in Scotland, the day before the announcement of Ward’s sacking.

Greig offered to intervene and act as go-between between CAA and the Liberal Democrats in a separate matter. As you can see in the above screenshot, CAA asked Greig to contact them by email regarding the meeting to discuss Ward as well as others matters.

We can reasonably assume, therefore, that Ward’s sacking was as a direct consequence and outcome of CAA’s meeting with the Liberal Democrats, Pickles challenging Farron in Parliament; and perhaps to a lesser extent, Greig’s role as an intermediary.

CAA was set up as a fake charity in 2014 by Gideon Falter after Israel’s Operation Protective Edge assault on Gaza. As stated earlier, Protective Edge massacred 2,400 Palestinians to further Israel’s efforts to legitimise its suppression of the Palestinian peoples’ right to self-determination and illegal expansionism and occupation of Palestine.

By lobbying in this way, to sack a member of a political party and prevent him from standing as a member of parliament, CAA is in fact in breach of charity law, as charity law clearly prevents such lobbying.

In addition, as it would appear that CAA is very much involved in lobbying activities, there is also a legal requirement for it to be registered as a lobbying organisation.

Notably, the charity, Greenpeace, was recently fined £30,000 for refusing to register as a lobbying organisation.

Screen Shot 2017-04-27 at 16.12.32.png

 

There is currently no evidence to confirm that CAA is also registered as a lobbying organisation, so it is also in breach of its requirement to register under the Administration Act of 2014.

CAA is part of an offensive to shut down any form of debate, criticism, or challenge to Israel’s Human Rights abuses and illegal occupation and ongoing settlement expansion programme. It is directly linked to the World Zionist Organisation and has been tasked specifically with the purpose of shutting down free speech in Britain under the guise of false claims of antiSemitism.

It also actively seeks to impose a definition of antiSemitism which prohibits any criticism of Israel and comparison of Israel to the Nazis or an apartheid/ fascist state.

CAA also actively lobbied for the expulsion of Baroness Jenny Tonge from the Liberal Democrats Party.

 
Author: Jason Schumann

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doh! UK Zionist Lobby Exposes The Zionist Lobby

24 Jan

 

Earlier today, on the 24 January 2017, the Times of Israel published an article penned by Justin Cohen, one of its News Editors.

The article concerns the recent 4-part undercover documentary conducted by Al-Jazeera; to expose – what can only be described, as the seriously seditious activities of Shai Masot at the behest of the Israeli government – to undermine British politics and democracy – including attempts at removing political opponents, like Sir Alan Duncan and Jeremy Corbyn – who are deemed to be obstacles and therefore incompatible with Israel’s aspirations and long-term goals.

Despite a public outcry and requests made by members of opposition parties – thus far, the PM, Theresa May, and the rest of her government – have categorically refused all calls for a public inquiry into the extent and scale of the role of Israeli government, its officials, actors, and diplomats, attempting to subvert and influence British democracy, favourably to Israel’s goals.

It is self-evident in Cohen’s article, that neither members of the UK Jewry, nor the Israeli government itself, are particularly happy about Al-Jazeera’s far-reaching expose of the tactics that the Israeli government is willing to employ and the lengths it is willing to go in order to push its expansionist agenda.

When Al-Jazeera’s expose was first aired – many (if not all) members of the Jewish diaspora, were unequivocally dismissive, and frankly insouciant – about the gravity of such nefarious interference of a foreign state (Israel) in another state’s (UK) sovereign powers – to independently and democratically, determine what its approach to and its foreign policy should entail. I dare say some were even apoplectic.

After Shai Masot was caught out in his candid admission of state-sanctioned and funded covert operations, to undermine British foreign and domestic policy, a prominent member of the UK Jewry, Jonathan Hoffman – who is a former Bank of England official – recently saw fit to use his own influence, to complain to members of the UK Parliament and House of Commons – seeking that Al-Jazeera be reprimanded for exposing something that is in all our interests to know and be aware of.

And guess what happened, folks?

Yes, you guessed it right!

The British government, like a compliant and pathetic lap dog rolling over on its back for its master, has happily kow-towed and will consider acting on Hoffman’s demands for it to reprimand Al-Jazeera.

(Now just for clarity, Theresa May, please remind us who your ‘Mamma’ is?)

 

Recently, Mr Hoffman, has let it be known, that anyone who speaks out against what many consider to be a rogue and terrorist state, its plans for expansion, or its human rights abuses, should automatically be considered an enemy of the Jewish diaspora and Israel itself.

Hoffman has made clear (in a recent Facebook post) that all dissenters should be discredited by “shining a light on the dissenter”, as opposed to “whispers to discredit them”.

(It appears that Mr Hoffman has since deleted or altered his Facebook account, attempting to disprove that he made these comments, but screenshots were obtained, prior to deletion).

You can also see Jonathan Hoffman in action here:

 

If, for some bizarre reason, you do not consider Mr Hoffman’s efforts to be a clear example and therefore somewhat of a confirmation of the existence of the Israeli/ Zionist lobby in action and its efforts to influence foreign democracies in its favour, one might wish to have a rethink about that.

Clearly, Mr Hoffman’s personal interventions, as a respected member of the Jewish establishment in the UK, to seek punitive measures against Al-Jazeera – for merely exposing the truth regarding Israel’s sedition – should be considered nothing short of an attempt at coercion or undue influence. In the very least, ‘crying foul’ or claiming ‘but that’s not fair’, when you have been caught out doing the deed.

In the last few days the Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), a so-called UK-based charity, that is known to use legal means to silence Israel’s critics, has also decided to flex its muscles, by lodging a formal complaint against Al-Jazeera with the Broadcasting Regulator, OFCOM.

Amongst many other accusations, CAA’s complaint claims that Al-Jazeera’s expose is “mendacious”, “inaccurate”, amounting to “unfair treatment” (of Masot?), and even “promot(ing) incitement”. CAA is also seeking to force or impose upon OFCOM for it to use and adopt a definition of antiSemitism that is widely disputed, because it infringes on universal rights of free speech, expression, assembly and protest.

In making these complaints, the wider agenda of Hoffman and CAA here, is, once and for all, to finally criminalise any and all criticism of Israel’s persistent human rights abuses and illegal occupation of Palestinians and further expansion into settlements. All of which, not doubt, could not happen without the direction, influence, and input of Israel itself.

Talk about shooting yourself and your cause in the foot, by trying to silence critics and, in actuality only serving to prove the ‘conspiracy’ of the ‘Lobby’ to be true by your own actions and interventions, Mr Hoffman and CAA?

Now, if you are reading this and you are in any way concerned – as any vaguely intelligent person should be – regarding any foreign state unduly influencing your own government’s sovereignty, you should sign this petition.

It seems clear and simple: Zionism is racism and a truly subversive element in world politics, that may well be to the detriment of all humankind!

 

Regards,

Jason Schumann

Xxxxxxx

 

%d bloggers like this: