Archive | Zionism RSS feed for this section

Zionist Lobby: Tim Farron, Liberal Democrats Party Leader, and the Sacking of David Ward, MP

27 Apr

 

On the 26 April, 2017, Tim Farron, leader of the UK Liberal Democrats, announced on Twitter that he had ‘sacked’ David Ward from the party.

Initially, Farron was reported as having stated that he was unable to intervene in local party politics or selection processes. Ward was to stand for election in the parliamentary seat of Bradford East on the 08 June, 2017.

However, after pressure from Sir Eric Pickles, the UK’s Special Envoy to Israel and Chair of Conservative Friends of Israel, and the ‘behind-the-scenes’ intervention of the nefarious and meddling Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), Farron decided to do an extraordinary u-turn, calling Ward ‘unfit to stand and represent the Party.

Ward is known to be very critical of the apartheid state of Israel and his comments have been somewhat hard-hitting and possibly unpleasant to some sensitive ears. For example, the year before Israel’s Protective Edge slaughtered more than 2,400 Palestinian including 500 children with the illegal use of White Phosphorus, Ward said:

“Am I wrong or are am I right? At long last the Zionists are losing the battle – how long can the apartheid State of Israel last?”

 

Prior to Farron’s u-turn on the matter, Mark Wallace, editor of Conservative Home, called his decision not to sack Ward “bullshit”. Not content with attacking Farron, Wallace then went on a tirade of abuse aimed at Ward, saying: “maybe fuck-off now, you weapons-grade scumbag” and posting a link to his blog about him.

Sadly, Wallace is under some illusion (a spell or cognitive dissonance?) and claims Ward’s comments about the insidiousness of Zionism, the Lobby, and Israel’s persistent Human Rights abuses amount to racism.

Possibly knowing that he or a colleague would be attending a meeting with the Liberal Democrats to discuss Ward, Stephen “Slitherman” Silverman, director of prosecutions and investigations for CAA, and a known harasser of women, was on hand to comment on Wallace’s abuse, suggesting he already knew what would happen to Ward.

Screen Shot 2017-04-27 at 15.25.58.png

 

Slitherman and CAA also enlisted the assistance of Martin Greig, a Liberal Democrat councillor in Scotland, the day before the announcement of Ward’s sacking.

Greig offered to intervene and act as go-between between CAA and the Liberal Democrats in a separate matter. As you can see in the above screenshot, CAA asked Greig to contact them by email regarding the meeting to discuss Ward as well as others matters.

We can reasonably assume, therefore, that Ward’s sacking was as a direct consequence and outcome of CAA’s meeting with the Liberal Democrats, Pickles challenging Farron in Parliament; and perhaps to a lesser extent, Greig’s role as an intermediary.

CAA was set up as a fake charity in 2014 by Gideon Falter after Israel’s Operation Protective Edge assault on Gaza. As stated earlier, Protective Edge massacred 2,400 Palestinians to further Israel’s efforts to legitimise its suppression of the Palestinian peoples’ right to self-determination and illegal expansionism and occupation of Palestine.

By lobbying in this way, to sack a member of a political party and prevent him from standing as a member of parliament, CAA is in fact in breach of charity law, as charity law clearly prevents such lobbying.

In addition, as it would appear that CAA is very much involved in lobbying activities, there is also a legal requirement for it to be registered as a lobbying organisation.

Notably, the charity, Greenpeace, was recently fined £30,000 for refusing to register as a lobbying organisation.

Screen Shot 2017-04-27 at 16.12.32.png

 

There is currently no evidence to confirm that CAA is also registered as a lobbying organisation, so it is also in breach of its requirement to register under the Administration Act of 2014.

CAA is part of an offensive to shut down any form of debate, criticism, or challenge to Israel’s Human Rights abuses and illegal occupation and ongoing settlement expansion programme. It is directly linked to the World Zionist Organisation and has been tasked specifically with the purpose of shutting down free speech in Britain under the guise of false claims of antiSemitism.

It also actively seeks to impose a definition of antiSemitism which prohibits any criticism of Israel and comparison of Israel to the Nazis or an apartheid/ fascist state.

CAA also actively lobbied for the expulsion of Baroness Jenny Tonge from the Liberal Democrats Party.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doh! UK Zionist Lobby Exposes The Zionist Lobby

24 Jan

 

Earlier today, on the 24 January 2017, the Times of Israel published an article penned by Justin Cohen, one of its News Editors.

The article concerns the recent 4-part undercover documentary conducted by Al-Jazeera; to expose – what can only be described, as the seriously seditious activities of Shai Masot at the behest of the Israeli government – to undermine British politics and democracy – including attempts at removing political opponents, like Sir Alan Duncan and Jeremy Corbyn – who are deemed to be obstacles and therefore incompatible with Israel’s aspirations and long-term goals.

Despite a public outcry and requests made by members of opposition parties – thus far, the PM, Theresa May, and the rest of her government – have categorically refused all calls for a public inquiry into the extent and scale of the role of Israeli government, its officials, actors, and diplomats, attempting to subvert and influence British democracy, favourably to Israel’s goals.

It is self-evident in Cohen’s article, that neither members of the UK Jewry, nor the Israeli government itself, are particularly happy about Al-Jazeera’s far-reaching expose of the tactics that the Israeli government is willing to employ and the lengths it is willing to go in order to push its expansionist agenda.

When Al-Jazeera’s expose was first aired – many (if not all) members of the Jewish diaspora, were unequivocally dismissive, and frankly insouciant – about the gravity of such nefarious interference of a foreign state (Israel) in another state’s (UK) sovereign powers – to independently and democratically, determine what its approach to and its foreign policy should entail. I dare say some were even apoplectic.

After Shai Masot was caught out in his candid admission of state-sanctioned and funded covert operations, to undermine British foreign and domestic policy, a prominent member of the UK Jewry, Jonathan Hoffman – who is a former Bank of England official – recently saw fit to use his own influence, to complain to members of the UK Parliament and House of Commons – seeking that Al-Jazeera be reprimanded for exposing something that is in all our interests to know and be aware of.

And guess what happened, folks?

Yes, you guessed it right!

The British government, like a compliant and pathetic lap dog rolling over on its back for its master, has happily kow-towed and will consider acting on Hoffman’s demands for it to reprimand Al-Jazeera.

(Now just for clarity, Theresa May, please remind us who your ‘Mamma’ is?)

 

Recently, Mr Hoffman, has let it be known, that anyone who speaks out against what many consider to be a rogue and terrorist state, its plans for expansion, or its human rights abuses, should automatically be considered an enemy of the Jewish diaspora and Israel itself.

Hoffman has made clear (in a recent Facebook post) that all dissenters should be discredited by “shining a light on the dissenter”, as opposed to “whispers to discredit them”.

(It appears that Mr Hoffman has since deleted or altered his Facebook account, attempting to disprove that he made these comments, but screenshots were obtained, prior to deletion).

You can also see Jonathan Hoffman in action here:

 

If, for some bizarre reason, you do not consider Mr Hoffman’s efforts to be a clear example and therefore somewhat of a confirmation of the existence of the Israeli/ Zionist lobby in action and its efforts to influence foreign democracies in its favour, one might wish to have a rethink about that.

Clearly, Mr Hoffman’s personal interventions, as a respected member of the Jewish establishment in the UK, to seek punitive measures against Al-Jazeera – for merely exposing the truth regarding Israel’s sedition – should be considered nothing short of an attempt at coercion or undue influence. In the very least, ‘crying foul’ or claiming ‘but that’s not fair’, when you have been caught out doing the deed.

In the last few days the Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), a so-called UK-based charity, that is known to use legal means to silence Israel’s critics, has also decided to flex its muscles, by lodging a formal complaint against Al-Jazeera with the Broadcasting Regulator, OFCOM.

Amongst many other accusations, CAA’s complaint claims that Al-Jazeera’s expose is “mendacious”, “inaccurate”, amounting to “unfair treatment” (of Masot?), and even “promot(ing) incitement”. CAA is also seeking to force or impose upon OFCOM for it to use and adopt a definition of antiSemitism that is widely disputed, because it infringes on universal rights of free speech, expression, assembly and protest.

In making these complaints, the wider agenda of Hoffman and CAA here, is, once and for all, to finally criminalise any and all criticism of Israel’s persistent human rights abuses and illegal occupation of Palestinians and further expansion into settlements. All of which, not doubt, could not happen without the direction, influence, and input of Israel itself.

Talk about shooting yourself and your cause in the foot, by trying to silence critics and, in actuality only serving to prove the ‘conspiracy’ of the ‘Lobby’ to be true by your own actions and interventions, Mr Hoffman and CAA?

Now, if you are reading this and you are in any way concerned – as any vaguely intelligent person should be – regarding any foreign state unduly influencing your own government’s sovereignty, you should sign this petition.

It seems clear and simple: Zionism is racism and a truly subversive element in world politics, that may well be to the detriment of all humankind!

 

Regards,

Jason Schumann

Xxxxxxx

 

Does the Zionist Lobby Really Exist?

20 Dec

 

Ask yourself, does the Zionist lobby really exist?

If it does, is it Jewhate or antiSemitic, to say that it does?

In short, the answer is both ‘Yes’ to the first part; and ‘No’, to the second!

Yes, the ‘lobby’ does exist; and ‘No’, it is not – by any means – antiSemitic or Jewhate (as it should be called), to say so!

The very fact that members of the Global Jewish diaspora, Zionists and supporters of, and the Israeli government itself, are currently applying strong-arm and subversive (international) pressure; to silence – any and all – dissent, and criticism against the state of Israel – via means of lobbying sovereign governments – and; more recently, bringing private prosecutions, against historical revisionists, or those who support the BDS movement and/ or who condemn or challenge Israel’s war crimes against Palestinians – is, frankly, evidence enough.

That these ‘nefarious’ groups and individuals – who, less than 100 years ago, sought to lobby the British and US governments, to support the legitimisation of the illegal annexation and occupation of Palestine (via the Balfour declaration and Havaara agreement) – and then the subsequent lobbying of the United Nations; to decriminalise Zionism, as a form of racism – as was led and orchestrated by B’Nai B’Rith, the oldest advocacy organisation for Jewish supremacy – is an anathema, and further evidence of their existence and such activities.

To be clear, it was European Jews who set up the world’s modern banking system- yes, of course they along with other (non Jewish) merchant financiers and ‘nobles’ – who funded the beginnings of global trade, British imperialism and also supported the continuation of slavery and two subsequent wars in 20th century Europe.

(Note: Until the establishment of the modern banking system, money lending was forbidden by Christians and Muslims).

 

Indeed, it was none other than a singular, profiteering, Nat Meyer Rothschild  (one of the founding fathers of Zionism and the establishment of Israel) and a family member and business partner – one August Belmont, also Jewish, of German origin – who, via the Rothschilds’ New York office – vehemently fought against the British government and Abraham Lincoln, to abolish slavery – in order to protect the former’s financial and business interests.

In case you are somehow – stupidly, and bizarrely, ignorant and unaware – it was, in point of fact, only because of successive boycotts of the sale and purchase of goods, like cotton and coffee – that the slave trade; and subsequent indenture system, of Afrikans – ever came to an end. It was Nat Rothschild himself who raised the finances to compensate – yes, ‘compensate’ – slave and plantation owners.

(Oh noes, boycotting Israel, for its crimes against humanity, is antiSemitic. Cough)!

 

As Jonathan Hoffman, a former Bank of England official, recently stated in a Facebook comment;

“Why shout when you can whisper”.

 

This quote, by Hoffman, is apparently a tactic used by Court Jews (Marranos); on how to ruin, and to condemn their critics and perceived enemies.

On the contrary, Hoffman actually believes:

“shining a sunlight on such dissenters”,  rather than whispers about them.

How noble of him!

 

(Note: No one, should ever doubt the suffering of Jews; certainly not me, as I am an individual of Afrikan and Jewish ancestry. I regularly receive abuse (on social media) for being ghey – mostly about my HIV status – and the fact that I am also often called a ‘nigger’ and a ‘self-loathing Jew’ (due to my Grandfather’s heritage) – you can guess who abuses me for the latter)!

 

Aside, in the UK, the organisation, recently founded and run by one Robert Festenstein, of Jewish Human Rights Watch has failed, miserably, to outlaw the BDS movement, as a valid form of freedom of expression, and dissent against criminal regimes, like Israel.

Similarly, the woeful Campaign Against AntiSemitism (CAA), led by the odious, spot-nosed and vexatious Gideon Falter, has so far, failed – despite his/ its continued efforts to suppress freedom of speech in the UK – and has had to resort to private prosecutions, in order to criminalise any form of public dissent against Israel.

I, am now apparently one of its targets. Needless to say, any claims or charges laid against me, will ultimately fail; as I can substantiate everything I say!

(Because of his threats against me about the fact that I dare to have the affront to make a challenge against him and speak out against the lobby; Gideon has decided to target me. It is because of these threats that, he is now subject to civil and criminal complaints, for harassment).

Gideon’s so-called ‘charitable’ organisation, is nothing more than a sham, attempting to subvert UK law, by means of bullying, threats, and coercion. This fact has been reported to the Charity Commission.

Any further attempts (by Gideon, CAA, or its ‘volunteers’) to harass or vilify me will be dealt with, severely.

Only recently, Gideon’s CAA, applauded Theresa May’s decision, to suggest that criticism of Israel, is antiSemitic; and therefore a punishable offence.You can see a link on their website and Facebook page.

This would be like allowing the government of Saudi to go unquestioned, regarding the cluster bombs it has used (that are in fact supplied by the UK) to target innocent Yemenis; or Mugabe’s regime, and its efforts to silence his critics and oust White Afrikans, from their adopted and purchased lands in Zimbabwe. Equally, allowing the faux White Helmets (founded by a British military officer) – or Syrian Observatory for Human Rights – to even remotely pretend that they are in any way humanitarian in their purpose.

As for the Community Security Trust (CST) – another nefarious organisation – which is currently being investigated by the Charity Commission, HMRC, and other public bodies – for its financial irregularities, which is also accused of having links to Mossad. CST uses its position to influence and leverage funding from the British government, at the expense of other minority groups who have suffered greater harm and abuse.

For example, in March 2016, CST secured £13.4m of taxpayers’ funding, to secure Jewish schools and places of worship. Yes, the Jewish community has and continues to be targeted by certain pervasive elements, but the vast majority of CST’s figures, for recorded abuse and attacks, have taken place online.

This is insignificant, in comparison to the murders, attacks, and abuse of other minority groups. Have any of these groups received any (UK) government funding or support? The answer is, NO! So why should CST and members of the Jewish community receive special protection? The narrative is simply; “We are the only ones who are being oppressed and discriminated against; We are the Chosenites”!

All of the above organisations have active and professional business links, to the Israeli government and politically active B’Nai B’Rith, as well as the World Zionist Organisation, which was founded and is run by Eitan Behar.

Here is what Eitan has to say about criticism of Israel on the WZO website:

“Our multilingual team of interns uses social networking to monitor, track and expose Antisemitic statements and expressions. We aim to give people like you the tools needed to counter and report anti-Jewish bigotry wherever and whenever it occurs. As proud Jews and Zionists, we publicly act to confront prejudice and demand an end to hateful messages.”

 

Interestingly, the pernicious and racist, Ambrosine Shitrit, of the socalled antihate org,  Eye On AntiSemitism, recently posted on social media, that she had a meeting with Eitan Behar, to discuss combatting valid criticism of Israel.

The purpose of her meeting with Eitan Behar was to discuss strategy to target individuals, like myself, and how to lobby and influence the UK government to criminalise holocaust revisionism/ ists, and the boycotting of Israeli goods.

She is quite blatant about her efforts on social media, and so is her hatred of Muslims and Palestinians. All information of these efforts is available on her Facebook pages and the World Zionist Organisation website.

Mrs. Shitrit has also posted numerous defamatory comments about me and even resorted to setting up a fake email account in my name. She is also a fan of the banned Pam Geller and other alt-Reich club members; and has an unhealthy interest in myself and Alison Chabloz, who is now subject to a private prosecution brought by Gideon Falter and CAA to silence freedom of speech in the UK.

Today, and with the blessing of our co-opted governments, the Zionist lobby, is attempting to stifle our freedom of speech. Indeed, it is Zionism, that; in part, promotes dislike of Jews. Why? Because since its inception, Zionism has always served to establish, create, and legitimise a state ofIsrael and its occupation of Palestinian lands and illegal settlements.

By which I mean, by any means necessary!

As noted by Theodor Herzl:

wp-1482356908867.jpg

Or a quote by Maurice Samuel, in his 1924 ‘You Gentiles’, in which he states that ‘Jews are the destroyers’… and that: ‘Nothing that you (Gentiles) do will meet our needs’.

This isn’t evidence enough of the Zionist lobby’s existence?

Go and search out the fly-on-the-wall documentary, floating around on Youtube, in the which the director of ADL National says to camera:”How do we use the myth of the lobby without confirming its existence”. Then he laughs.

As Chair, Gideon’s CAA, along with other pro-Israel voices, have successfully lobbied Eric Pickles, MP and the British government to adopt a new, more stringent definition of antiSemitism, which states that, boycotting Israel and criticising Israel should also be considered antiSemitic. In law, it has no legal basis, but has been issued as guidance to the UK Crown Prosecution Service.

It would be in breach of Human Rights law if it were ever applied.

You can see evidence of Gideon’s efforts, here.

If this isn’t further evidence of lobbying for ‘self-interest for and by a particular group’, what is?

Here, in this following link of a speech given by a UK Peer, in the House of Lords, you can hear how the Zionist Lobby physically beats dissenters unconscious, ladels persistent and false accusations of antiSemitism, and proactively seeks to damage individual careers and reputations.

 

If you speak about it in reference to Zionists or Jews, you are automatically accused of antiSemitism. This is part of their strategy. I referred to it above, from a quote by Jonathan Hoffman:“shining a sunlight on such dissenters”.

It’s called character assassination and, more covertly, ‘full spectrum dominance‘ – which is a form of control, that is more often than not – used to humiliate, defame, ruin and ostracise individuals, who dissent or deviate from the norm of the tripe that we are spoon-fed on a daily basis.

Here’s Gideon’s CAA encouraging (((its))) supporters to ruin the respected Jewish journalist, Mira-Bar Hillel:

 

As referenced above, on its website, the World Zionist organisation clearly states that it will circulate information and expose individuals to its global networks.

Shining a light? Whispers? Are you getting this now? And its somehow antiSemitic or an expression of hatred of Jews to say the lobby really exists, really??

 

Note: I have never disliked or expressed hatred towards Jews, but they, like Shitrit, have and continue to do towards me. I find the abuse I regularly receive, gut-wrenching and profoundly frustrating, but I will stand by their right to say it (about me), unless it breaches my privacy, copyright, or it is incitement.

All of these matters against several individuals are currently under police investigation.

 

Regards,

Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann

 

Special Note:

This article has not been published to condemn Israel or Jews. Israel and Jews have a right to self-determination and a homeland; just not at the expense of Palestinians.

That said, no one is exempt from valid criticism for human rights breaches. I fully support the right of Israel to exist.

All comments, images, and other information posted in this blog, are in the public domain and believed to be a matter of public record. I, Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann, believe and assert that the contents herein, have been posted in good faith, in the belief that they are true and not in any way specious or false.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Trial of Alison Chabloz

14 Dec

[Blog Updated on 31 December, 2016 and 21 April, 2017]

Screen Shot 2016-12-12 at 00.43.14.png

In the above image, from left to right, we have Ambrosine “Shittyknickers” Shitrit, Rakhel (Rachel) Dobrikova, and Gideon Falter.

We will talk about them in a moment, but let’s first touch on Alison Chabloz, their not-so innocent victim.

For avoidance of doubt, I should first make it absolutely clear, that what transpires in the following, in no way denies the suffering of the Jewish diaspora, right to self-determination, or their right to a homeland.

Alison is a British musician, whom I know well. For a time, Alison and I used to be friends. We parted company acrimoniously, due to a misunderstanding on her part. Like me, Alison is pro-Palestinian and an anti-Zionist. We are both very vocal about this on social media, which has drawn considerable abuse for us both, but Alison more so.

Our chief, self-appointed, longterm foe, and abuser, is the truly despicable and pernicious Ambrosine Shitrit.

For the record, Ambrosine is a Zionista and has harassed and targeted Alison and I, for more than 4 years. She, Ambrosine that is, is now under police investigation as a result of her crimes and continued harassment against me.

Not content with abusing online, Ambrosine has taken it upon herself as a mission to pursue Alison in every aspect of her life, intent on destroying her.

It’s worth noting here, that because of her abuse of Alison, myself and others, Ambrosine has had over 30 (yes, 30!) accounts suspended on social media platforms like Twitter.

We’ll call Ambrosine Shittyknickers from here on, because that’s how much disdain I have for the nasty Islamophobic, Fascist Grade A bitch, that she is!

Shittyknickers’ abuse of Alison began with the usual insults and trolling on Twitter, calling her a Nazi and anti-Semitic… because of Alison’s support of Muslims against the rise of Islamophobia in the UK, and her views regarding Israel’s maltreatment of Palestinians and illegal occupation of their lands.

Her abuse then took a turn and became more serious… and disturbing!

Shittyknickers became aware that Alison was working on a cruise ship and decided to take it upon herself to write an anonymous letter to her employer, informing them that Alison is anti-Semitic.

As a direct result, Alison was called into the captain’s office, sacked, and told to disembark.

She was left stranded in a foreign country, with no way to get home. I offered to step in but someone else did instead.

Shittyknickers also sends Alison anonymous presents and cards in the post. You can guess the sort of thing.

(Derbyshire police, Alison’s local force, have done absolutely zip about this abuse and harassment).

 

Fast forward a year or so, and Alison was performing at the Edinburgh Festival and took the opportunity to say fuck you to Shittyknickers and her many other, mainly Zionist abusers.

It was quite silly and impetuous of Alison, but she decide to do this by taking a photograph of herself outside Edinburgh Castle gesturing the Quenelle, which is a symbol that many Jews have adopted as an anti-Semitic one.

Alison then posted this photograph on social media.

Ermagherrd!

Boy was there complete butthurt and uproar — all hell broke loose!

Alison had made a rod for her back in doing this, and has come in for a hard ride ever since.

Because of Alison’s – well, stupidity, in gesturing the Quenelle – all the vultures and cockroaches came out with their pitchforks, knives and poison pens, baying for blood.

There were letters to the Edinburgh Festival organisers, blogs, newspaper articles in Jewish media and a defamatory article in the Sun by the paedo-linked, perma foot-in-mouth moron that is Louise “Stenchof” Mensch.

Like a pig in shit (pardon my candidness again!), Alison was revelling in the fact that she had stuck one up to her haters and abusers – yes, she has narcissistic tendencies!

Ruining Alison’s career, sending hate mail to her parents’ home, and smearing her in the press as an anti-Semite, just wasn’t enough for Shittyknickers. Along with the equally vile Rakhel Dobrikova, and a convicted fraudster and alleged scam artist  Jasna Badzak, and professional victim Suzanne Fernandez, they all embarked on a series of false and malicious reports to the police about Alison.

(Until recently, their reports came to nothing).

 

In response, Alison went on the offensive. Again, stupidly – many would suggest – Alison began mocking her abusers on her Youtube channel. Alison’s ill-conceived efforts, to goad and mock her abusers briefly brought her to the attention of Mark Lewis, a Zionist Jewish Lawyer, who sent her a series of now deleted messages on Twitter, expressing his delight if she were to die.

Following recent media coverage, I was intrigued and stumbled across the lovely Rakhel (not!) actually engaged in spying on Alison’s Facebook page several days ago, presumably on a reporting mission (See below).

I challenged her and asked her purpose for being on Alison’s Facebook. She couldn’t provide an honest or straight answer. Rakhel promptly reported back to one Gideon Falter, claiming I had made offensive comments to her about members of the Jewish community.

Gideon then emailed me, making futile and ill-considered threats to me. His own stupidity has rightly gotten my back up; and so, I rightly told him to fuck off!

Here’s the wonderfully scheming and abusive Rakhel now seeking to engage a colleague of mine and harassing my work account by making idle threats for exposing her vitriol and lies. Threats, by the way, that she liberally makes to others and that have no legal basis and will never stand up in a court of law, let alone pass water.

Another one of the vengeful cabal involved in plotting against Alison is a woman by the name of Caroline Ost. You can see evidence in the following links of how determined they are to silence Alison. Here is Caroline admitting to a member of the prosecution team in the case against Alison, that she (as well as others) have made reports about her to the police.

When I say ‘silence’ Alison, what I mean is… by any means they can and at their disposal! The exact phrase used by Caroline et al, in the exchange shown in the following link, is that Alison is some kind of ’cause’ for them; or rather silencing her (and thus you and me) is ultimately their mission.

Read on. I will explain in more detail what I mean by ‘mission’.

As referenced above, into the fray comes one Gideon Falter, who is the Chair of the UK ‘so-called’ registered charity, Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA).

Because Gideon, Shittyknickers, Caroline, and the rest of their rabid cabal, were unhappy with what they say was the police failing to prosecute Alison, Gideon has brought a private prosecution against her, under s.127 of the UK’s Communication Act, 2003.

The case has been brought because of one of Alison’s songs. Yes, a satirical song about historical revisionism and a perceived sense of singular ‘privilege’ and ‘victimhood’, that is often used as a stick, to beat those who question or challenge about the head!

Yes, these abhorrent characters are this desperate to silence Alison.

You only need look here in this following exchange on social media, to see that Gideon Falter himself has conveyed a message via Caroline asking an anonymous Twitter user (and a number of other individuals) not to interfere with CAA’s efforts to silence Alison, so that they can have  ‘their moment of glory’ (sic).

Yes, you read that correctly; these relentless, overbearing vultures wish to make an example of Alison (and you and me), by setting a legal precedent – via the back door – to make any questioning of historical events, or criticism of Israeli war crimes, an illegal act.

Ken Aidel (more research underway on this one), has freely and publicly stated on his Twitter account, that Gideon Falter himself has requested him or someone linked to him and CAA, to remove any mention of Alison from his Twitter feed.

Gideon even went to the extraordinary lengths to hold a special recruitment event in November, to enlist the services of legal counsel for the case. The preliminary hearing was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court, in London, on Thursday, the 15 December, 2016.


One of CAA’s fervent supporters was recently very active on social media, almost orgasming at the prospect of what he believes will be the end of Alison and (everyone else’s, for that matter) right to freedom of speech to challenge and criticise Israel and question historical events.

There are unconfirmed rumours that this ‘supporter’, who goes by the name ‘Robbersdog’ is thought to be none other than Stephen Silverman, CAA’s director of investigations and enforcement. However, what we can absolutely confirm, is that Silverman confessed in court to being behind a troll account known as @BedlamJones. He was compelled to admit this under questioning by the defence; that, or face perjury charges. Since CAA commenced its private prosecution against Alison, Silverman has been busy deleting self-incriminating tweets.

Apparently, Gideon’s case against Alison is a test case.

Needless to say, the case will likely and ultimately fail, as Gideon’s claim is legally misconceived, and amounts to an outrageous abuse of the law and court process.

Some of you reading this will be unaware, but very similar vexatious and frivolous efforts, by Jewish Human Rights Watch, also failed and were rightly thrown out for the same reason.

If, by some miraculous act of the Lard, Alison is found guilty, the UK can kiss good-bye to freedom of speech — no thanks to the Zionist lobby that operates with the apparent sanction of the government in the UK.

Note: Almost everyone in this blog is Jewish, adding credence to the view – that Jews, in general – have an issue with being mocked or challenged on their views, historical events we are ‘told’ to accept as incontrovertible fact, or Israel’s war crimes. It’s a kind of profound form of a persecution complex that brings out the worst in some people. 

It also suggests that (((they))) and their subordinates and collaborators, will use any means necessary (and) at their disposal, to influence and/ or bend the law to their will; to target, silence, and ruin anyone with whom they disagree or whom questions their precious claim to special victim status.

Indeed, it’s all part of the psychosis of Jewish victimhood and perceived sense of divine privilege, as the “Chosenites”.

This vindictive and malevolent behaviour, of seeking to destroy someone, is a perfect example of how morally bankrupt and psychopathic some of these people are.

If you are in any doubt about what I am saying here, just take a look at this website: http://izionist.org

If we all sit or stand on our ‘not me’ laurels, in silence, failing to challenge them and speak out, we are part of the problem, which means we are all fucked! By which, I mean the whole of humanity. We need to organise to fight them!

Because I will not be silenced I am now a target and have been threatened by CAA. I am also being harassed by its volunteers and supporters who have attempted to hack my Facebook account, launched a failed cyber attack on my website, and abuse me online with obscenities about my HIV status and ethnicity, as well as setting up fake social media accounts in my name.

If you read this, Gideon, despite the fact that I disagree with Alison’s methods and many of her views, because of your recent threats to me and subversive efforts to misuse the law to push a wider agenda; be mindful that I haven’t finished with you or CAA yet, so watch this space. I promise you it will not end well!

 

Update:

  1. Alison was granted unconditional bail; the case adjourned until March 2017. An application to Strike Out was dismissed.
  2. Two days before Christmas day, Alison was again dragged before the court. This time she has effectively been banned from all social media until after her trial.
  3. Jonathan Hoffman, a prominent member of  the UK Jewry and a former Bank of England official claims that he spoke with one of the Magistrate’s at Alison’s hearing and is consequently able to confirm she will likely be given a fine. Note: This has now been reported to the police and the court.
  4. Click here for a clear example of the level of conceit and malice of Ambrosine “Shittyknickers” Shitrit.
  5. Note: Ambrosine, this blog ain’t ever coming down. Not even by a court order. Try me.
  6. Shittyknickers now claiming that I have a police warning for calling her Shittyknickers. In short, it is a lie and she is in for a big shock very soon. I will post a new blog once everything is confirmed.
  7. Alison has recently been informed by the police that the malicious charges brought against her by those she refers to as ‘the Fishwives‘ have been dropped. Presumably because the charges were indeed malicious. No doubt the fishwives will be frothing with oodles of major butthurt. Such tears are truly delicious. 


     

     

    Regards,

    Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann

     

    Legal Disclaimer:

    All comments, images, and other information posted in this blog, are in the public domain and believed to be a matter of public record. I, Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann, assert and believe the contents herein, have been posted in good faith, in the belief that they are true and not in any way specious or false.

     

     

    Special Note:

    I have backed up my blogs and archived all links provided in the above post.

     

     

    Twitter Launches All-Out Assault On Freedom Of Speech

    18 Nov

    The focus of this blog article is set out in two parts:

    a) The rightful shutting down and suspensions of social media user accounts that espouse, promote, and/ or incite hatred;

    b) The wrongful shutting down and suspensions of social media user accounts that espouse valid criticism of human rights abuses by oppressive nation states.

    Despite falling traffic and market value, in a drive to combat so-called online ‘hate speech’, Twitter has recently started banning controversial and/ or outspoken user accounts on its social media platform.

    One of the first accounts to fall foul of Twitter’s perma-suspension/ lifetime ban, was that of Milo Yiannopoulos, known as ‘the infamous internet troll.’

    This was back in July 2016, after he (Milo) attacked the actress, Leslie Jones, and encouraged his followers to do the same, which included her receiving death threats and racial abuse.

    More recently, Twitter has begun dishing out bans to similar accounts of the alt-right.

    Slate has since reported, that the most prominent of these, was Richard Spencer, director of a white nationalist think tank, the National Policy Institute. His associated accounts were also suspended.

    USA Today also reports that other alt-right user accounts have been suspended.

    Other accounts, such as Tarek Fatah, David Vance, Tommy Robinson, Pam Geller, Pat Condell, Paul Joseph Watson, and Robert Spencer, have so far escaped the culling.

    Don’t get me wrong, Twitter is right to do this.

    In this instance, this is not about silencing rights and freedoms to speak one’s mind, seek to offend, or be politically incorrect. The issue here, is one of stopping hate speech and incitement.

    As evidence of the problem, we only need look at Trump’s rhetoric during the presidential campaign. There is clear evidence that his comments spawned several thousand racist hate attacks, abuse, and also murders, across the US. How do we know Trump is to blame? Well, in many of the incidents, his supporters, who have been the perpetrators in many instances, claimed to have his consent to carry out their racist acts.

    Within the last few days, Tommy Robinson, the Pegida, UK leader and founder of the former English Defence League, incited his followers to claim that an anti-Islamophobia campaign, #IAM2016, launched by Mend Community, was in fact, a campaign supporting Daesh.

    It is clear, that the alt-right are inciting hatred and abuse online, which, in turn, manifests in our every day real lives, causing genuine harm and suffering; mainly to the lives of minority communities.

    (As an aside, the recent and now more prevalent use of the term ‘alt-right’ is a deliberately misapplied label, that is used to disguise, not only the views of those who consider themselves as libertarians espousing the right to offend and speak without censure, but also to make the views of extremists and racists on the far right more acceptable and tolerated.

    Indeed, use of the term ‘alt-right’ is one of the single most cynical, perverse and iniquitous attempts by the likes of Milo, Robinson, Watson et al, to seek to diminish and white-wash the impact of hate speech and racism ladled on minorities and trivialise what they perceive is the right to abuse, cause offence and spread hatred).

    Without doubt, Twitter should be applauded for its efforts to curb members of the Far Right from spreading hate, marginalising minorities, promoting homophobia, misogyny, racial abuse, and inequality.

    After-all, there is no such thing as free speech without responsibility. Any sane and reasonable person accepts this. If not, you are more than likely to have one or more personality disorders.

    More worryingly, however, is that Twitter is now actively silencing liberals and socialists, like myself, who speak out against members of the Far Right and crimes of oppressive regimes, such as Saudi, Turkiye and Israel.

    Erdogan and Netanyahu have both actively sought to crush the right of any individual to criticise their national policies of brutality, human rights abuses, political interventions, and continued war crimes.

    For its part, the UK-based Community Security Trust (CST), working on behalf of the Israeli government, announced a few days ago, that it is working with and to ‘influence’ and re-educate Twitter to ‘remove’ anti-Zionist accounts, critical of Israel’s apartheid, demonstrated by its forced displacement of people, and illegal annexation and occupation of Palestinian lands.

    As the journalist Asa Winstanley recently reminded us with a post on his Twitter feed, CST – a so-called registered charity, under the guise of monitoring anti-Semitism – ‘leads’, and ‘has been secretly participating in counter measures to shut down campaigns by the BDS movement‘, for a number of years.

    The relevance of the use of the word ‘secretly’ in the above statement, by Asa, is very pertinent here.

    As is clearly evident by recent statements made by the UK Tory party Conservative Friends of Israel, CST proactively seeks to influence and subvert the UK Government in its effort to have anti-Zionism and the BDS movement labelled as anti-Semitic and thus proscribed. Thereby creating a new offence, punishable by criminal sanction, such as a fine or prison sentence.

    ‘Antony Lerman — a genuine expert on the problem of anti-Semitism and anti-Jewish violence in Europe — has strongly criticized the CST for its conflation of anti-Semitism with any moves to question the behavior of the State of Israel.’

    (Quote from Sarah Irving Lobby Watch, published on Electronic Intifada’s site on 20 January 2015)

    CST’s efforts to criminalise BDS and anti-Zionism in the UK have thus far failed, despite mucho butthurt outrage and protestations from other, equally, subversive and vexatious UK-based Jewish organisations, including by the Israeli government itself and Mark Regev, its UK Ambassador.

    Like its counter-parts, such as the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, one of the other nefarious tactics that CST employs – in seeking to silence constructive debate and criticism to challenge and bring Israel’s human rights abuses to the fore – is to recruit, train, and work with individual volunteers. These volunteers then harass and name and shame BDS supporters and anti-Zionists online and in their real lives.

    Both CST and CAA also encourage their volunteers to make multiple false and malicious reports to Twitter – in order to have BDS and pro-Palestinian accounts suspended – as recently happened to my Twitter account.

    (As shown in the above link, @BedlamJones (regarding my own account suspension) is a well-known Zionist troll on social media, working with CST and other Zionist propaganda organisations, to have mine and other anti-Zionist twitter accounts suspended. It was CST who personally had my own account suspended).

    My own account was suspended because I tweeted a meme of a troll doll with the quote ‘I would pay to see a noose around my trolls’ neck’. Twitter claims that my tweet was a violent threat and targeted harassment.

    Similarly to making multiple false reports to Twitter, CST and CAA actively encourage their volunteers to gather potential evidence and make reports to the police to bring criminal charges of anti-Semitism. Insofar as I am aware, these efforts have failed in all but one case.

    There is also new evidence that CST and CAA ‘volunteers’ are actively attempting to hack BDS and anti-Zionist social media accounts, as shown here:

    https://twitter.com/JOYOURPAPARAZZI/status/800278221405257729

    Twitter, more bizarrely, is now is now being increasingly selective and biased in which accounts it will suspend. In an experiment conducted by one user, the user tweeted the same post, but from two different accounts, substituting the word ‘White’ for the word ‘Black’. Guess which account Twitter suspended.

    I will leave you with this quote by Voltaire:

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    In conclusion, it appears that the battle for freedom of speech; to challenge racism, oppression, and the criminal activity of nations such as Israel, has now stalled, and that by collusion with Twitter, proponents of, have won the argument for the moment.

    All this serves to do, is to drive people away and make them more determined.

    From my perspective, efforts to counter criticism of Israel’s war crimes, by smears, discrediting, and malicious reports, also ferments and exacerbates animosity toward Israel and Jews in general.

    Yes, extremism, racism and anti-Semitism are entirely wrong! That said, I believe Zionism is racism.

    I, and others like me, will continue to fight it!

    The same view applies to the likes of Saudi and Turkiye.

    TAKE NOTE: One day, we will rise again, and there will be change, but let’s just hope the Far Right don’t!



    By Jason Schumann

    formerly @debatingculture

    Zionist Witchhunt Against Jewish Jackie Walker and UK Labour (1)

    2 Oct

    Jackie Walker is a founding member and Vice-Chair of UK Labour’s Momentum movement, and is a Black Jewess, who is married to a fellow Jew. She has recently been suspended from the party for a second time, due to further false accusations of antiSemitism.

    Initially, the claims of antiSemitism against her, came from members of the UK’s Jewry and Jewish media outlets, after her comments regarding Jewish involvement in slavery, as instigated by Jewish News and the Jewish Chronicle.

    Yes, it was an exaggeration (by Jackie) that Jews were the chief or sole financiers of the slave trade, but that does not negate the role of prominent European and New World Jews as commodities traders, merchants, slave sellers, ship owners, and plantation owners, who, along with many more non-Jews, who fought against and opposed the abolition of slavery, due fear of losing privilege and wealth. (2)

    (Search ‘August Belmont’, a Jew, employed by, and later married into the Rothschilds, who oversaw their New York operations of sugar, cotton, and rum.

    It was a Rothschild whom leveraged and raised the finances (at the request of British and other governments) to compensate slave and plantation owners. Belmont worked with anti-abolitionists, such as members of the Society of Merchant Venturers). (3)

     

    In regard to more recent false claims of anti-Semitism or Jew-hate laid against Jackie, the likes of the militant and vexatious Jewish Human Rights Watch and Sussex Friends have targeted her.

    This latest attack against her occurred after video footage of a closed discussion at conference, was leaked directly to the Jewish press.

    In the video, Jackie makes her views known about commemorating victims of all holocausts, asserting the view that Holocaust Memorial Day should remember all victims of such genocides and not be limited to one particular community. In this case, members of the World Jewry.

    As was made perfectly clear to me by Olivia Marks-Woldman of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust (HMDT), a day or so before Jackie’s comments, many members of the Jewish community believe they have sole ownership of the term ‘holocaust’. Moreover, that the genocide of Jews in World War 2 is unique and possibly the worst genocide in history.

    Cue Joe Mulhall, also of the HMDT, who used his leverage and position as a Researcher for Hope Not Hate (HnH) and as a Trustee of HMDT, to publish a blog, on HnH’s website, subtly condemning Jackie Walker, in which he also accuses her of antiSemitism.

    When I challenged HnH on social media of being duplicitous in conspiring against Jackie with faux claims of antiSemitism, I was immediately blocked.

    Nick Lowles, Director of HnH, even went as far as to accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist. Needles to say, I kindly informed Nick that I would not be retracting any of my comments regarding HnH’s collusion with HMDT to smear Jackie, adding that he could sue me if he felt HnH had been so aggrieved by them. Nick has remained silent on the matter.

    (Interestingly, Ruth Smeeth, MP, who has made numerous claims of antiSemitism against Jeremy Corbyn and supporters of him, because of her own Jewish identity, is also a (former) director of HnH, and was recently exposed as having links with AIPAC and BICOM and being referred to in a US Government memo leaked by Wikileaks, as being a ‘special asset’ in US/ UK/ Israeli relations worth protecting). (4)

     

    After reading Joe’s blog, I tried to add my own comments to the blog, but so far, it appears that I have been censured. My comments in reply, and copied in italics immediately below, are yet to be moderated and are unlikely to be included. Indeed, I doubt they will.

    “It is not anti-Semitic of Jackie to be honest in stating the role of Jews in the slave trade, because it is true.

    As well as other Europeans, Portuguese, Spanish, Jewish — who owned slave ships, plantations, and slaves themselves, it was a prominent Jew, along with others, both Jews and non-Jews, who prevented the first abolition act passing and subsequently raised the capital to compensate slave owners after it was passed.

    Similarly, I am calling Olivia Marks-Woldman is a hypocrite.

    Only two days ago she told me that a memorial solely for Jewish victims (of WW2) is deserved because their suffering is unique (sic).

    This implies privilege, victim status, which diminishes suffering and value of other victims — of other such atrocities.

    World War 2 is not the only holocaust in our shared history and it is certainly not the worst. If we are to have a memorial and learning centre for holocaust victims, it should be for victims of all holocausts. It is not anti-Semitic to say this.

    https://debatingculture.wordpress.com/2016/09/29/remembering-victims-of-holocaust-a-memorial-for-one-or-all/

    Joe, that you sit on the HMDT and HnH have given you a platform to attack Jackie Walker — as one of its employee — is either suspect, despicable, or both.

    Shame on HnH for pandering to faux claims of antiSemitism!” (5)

     

    Mark Wallace, Editor of Conservative Home, who believes slavery is form of migration, has also supported Joe’s HnH blog. When I challenged his involvement (in the deliberate smear campaign against Jackie Walker and UK Labour), he also blocked me and accused me of being a conspiracy theorist and anti-Semite.

    Far from being a conspiracy theorist or anti-Semite, it would appear quite obvious that there is indeed an orchestrated campaign to target members of UK Labour, falsely accusing them of antiSemitism.

    It would also seem that the Tory party itself and senior members of UK Jewry are involved, if not the key instigators. It was a member of the Tory party (along with members of UK Jewry, and Jewish press) whom reported Jackie to the Labour party. It is also believed, though not substantiated, that Sussex Friends infiltrated Jackie Walker’s closed session at conference and primed her, before leaking comments to Jewish and then other media outlets. (6)

    These false claims of ‘antischwemitism’ smack of victimhood and double standards in order to guilt-shame us and close down any valid, critical debate. (See 7, below)

    I mean, imagine if a Black or Muslim person complained in this way. They would (and nearly always are) immediately be accused of playing the ‘race card’ or being a taqiyya Muslim. (8)

    I do not make these statements lightly. I have researched this, thoroughly, and will happily provide supporting evidence, if requested. Take offence or dispute anything, challenge or sue me! I can back up everything I have written in this article.

    In no way do I believe that Jackie Walker is an anti-Semite, nor should she have been suspended from the party.

    The Momentum committee agreed that Jackie was not anti-Semitic in the things that she has said, but that she was ill-judged in doing so, thus making her position untenable. This is a victory for her detractors (Tories, Zionists, and Jews) and a blow against speaking out about what we know and believe to be the truth. Nonetheless, it is not the victory they wanted, as Jackie is to remain a member of Momentum and the steering group. (9)

    The truth remains that Jews did play a role in slavery; that many Jews and non-Jews do conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism; and there have been many holocausts throughout our histories, not just one.

    They are all worth commemorating on equal terms of validity and suffering, so that future generations learn from all humanity’s past crimes.

    If you believe otherwise, I say ask yourself why.

     

     

    By Jason Schumann

     

     

    Amendments:

    I have included the following amendments to clarify a few concerns and points of reference and clarification.

    1. Clarifying use of ‘Zionism’ to not be conflated with Jews or Judaism, as they are separate ideologies, sometimes confused or presented as one and the same.
    2. Made clear that Jackie Walker’s comment about Jews being chief financiers is an exaggeration at worst and ill-considered overstatement in the least.
    3. In parentheses, I have included reference to historical records re August Belmont and Rothschilds’, and other Jews, to evidence (Jewish) involvement in slavery.
    4. Used parentheses to emphasis Hope Not Hates links to Zionists and the political classes.
    5. Corrected several errors in my comments to Joe Mulhall’s HnH blog – still not moderated or added as comment to their website.
    6. Added additional information regarding Tory involvement in reporting Jackie Walker and the suspected involvement of Sussex Friends in the second report to the Labour party.
    7. Clarifying use of term ‘antischwemitism’, as a satirical and mocking term at false claims of anti-Semitism/ Jew-hate. If valid (in this case not), neither should be mocked, ridiculed, or diminished.
    8. Added reference to comparisons of Black and Muslim people to emphasis disparity.
    9. Removed petition link to reinstate Jackie Walker, as members of Momentum  voted her out as Vice-Chair.

     

     

    03 October 16 at 23:00 GMT.

    Remembering Victims of Holocaust: A Memorial for One or All?

    29 Sep

    As part of an address to British Jewish communities, former PM, David Cameron, pledged that the UK Government would fund a memorial in remembrance of the mainly Jewish victims of World War 2.

    The memorial is to be sited in Victoria Tower Gardens, next to Parliament.

    Since the announcement, plans for the memorial are now expected to include a learning centre, for school groups and visitors to London.

    A competition was recently announced for the design of the memorial, including plans for the learning centre.

    If it does not run over budget, the whole project is expected to cost around £50 million, largely paid for by the British taxpayer.

    As noted in the Mirror, ‘UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation chairman, Sir Peter Bazalgette, said: “The task of the Holocaust Memorial Foundation was to find a site that would allow a striking, prominent and iconic memorial to be built.”‘

    In effect, the memorial and learning centre, will become Britain’s answer to Auschwitz and the Anne Frank Museum.

    Understandably, a number of individuals, including myself have voiced concerns. Some, rightly or wrongly, now consider it an industry.

    For me, as I will explain, I do not believe that there has ever been only one holocaust, but that there have been many holocausts, of equal significance, and equal worthiness of commemorating the victims of.

    Indeed, when I asked Olivia Marks-Woldman, CEO of the Holocaust Memorial Trust, ‘why can we not have a universal memorial and learning centre to remember all holocausts not just one?’

    Her response was, because the ‘Holocaust’ was unique.’

    (I’ve since emailed her to clarify this profound and exceptional differentiating statement, but I am yet to receive a response or acknowledgement).

     

    Sorry, not sorry! No one event in our wretched histories that ‘qualifies’ as a holocaust/ genocide, is no less, or more unique or significant than any other similar event in history.

    To imply that it (WWII) is deserving of  uniqueness, only serves to diminish the other (such catastrophic events, in our shared histories) and asserts privilege of one group of victims (of such events) and the suffering (and heinous acts committed against one group) over another.

    As Jackie Walker, of the UK Labour party’s Momentum group recently noted — and was subsequently on the receiving end of a tremendous amount of unwarranted vitriol from Jewish media for stating — the term ‘Holocaust’ is not a term that is the preserve or monopoly of Jews alone (paraphrased).

    Indeed. Jews were not the only victims of World War 2.

    In case you do not know/ have forgotten, many members of Roma, Polish, Muslims, LGBT, and other communities were victims too.

    Clearly, a £50 million memorial, solely for the remembrance of Jewish victims of World War 2, simply reinforces ideas of (Jewish) privilege and victimhood, thus reinforcing negative stereotypes and prejudicial resentment of Jews.

    Here is a list of Holocausts in recent times:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

     

    The term ‘Holocaust’ does not, nor has it ever done, belonged solely to members of the Jewish community.

    The term ‘holocaust’  was only adopted as such, in the 1950’s, after World War 2.

    (The term ‘Holocaust’, in its original meaning, refers to sacred burning or sacrifice.)

     

    It was first used in terms of genocide by John Milton in the 17th century.

    If we are to remember ALL our dead, at the hands of bastards, murderers, and maniacal dictators, and learn from such past atrocities, committed by and against humankind, what we should have, is one memorial, and one learning centre, to remember all victims of all holocaust and genocidal acts.

    It is my view, that we should (all) universally unite in our mourning, condemnation, and determination to say: Never Again!

    A very recent study I have conducted confirms that such a memorial should not be attributed to Jews alone.

    Why?

    Because it devalues and assigns all other victims of holocaust to second status.

     

     

    By Jason Schumann

     

     

    Online Harassment, David Hirsh, Marko Attila Hoare, Jasna Badzak, Zionist Smears, 35 Hack Attempts on My Twitter Account

    9 Sep

    Updated on Sunday, 18 September, 2016 at 17:27

     

    The following images are of two of my abusers.

    Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 23.38.43.png

    [Images publicly available via the interwebz: Jasna Badzak and Marko Attila Hoare]

     

    Introduction:

    This is an article about the online abuse I have suffered and smear campaigns to silence me, because of my view and campaigning on Human Rights.

    It is a truly disgusting picture of the depravity of human nature and efforts, tactics, and extremes that state actors and their supporters will  deploy to smear, and damage critics and activists.

     

    About Me:

    I am a researcher, human rights campaigner, occasional blogger/ writer, very outspoken, and former senior arts manager.

    I run my own (this) blog and use to write for News786, before the news site ran into trouble with Modi. I’ve also published one or two articles on the Medium site.

    My current area of research is focussed on the UK Counter Extremism Strategy and its impact on British Muslim communities. I am also conducting research on the themes of migration, refugees, and LGBTI Human Rights abuses.

    My Human Rights work includes: campaigning against the closure of the Calais ‘Jungle’ refugee camp, the Human Zoo protest, Rohingya, #BlackLivesMatter, the French governments attempt to ban the burka, and previously a two year campaign on Ebola.

    I publish several small newsletters and e-bulletins on various Human Rights and civil society issues.

    I also run several networks, including the largest Facebook group for artists and craft-makers, enabling collaborations between artists, sharing work and expertise, posting opportunities for exhibiting, making, fellowships, employment etc.

    I am very active on Twitter and tweet about the current crisis in Yemen, #BlackLivesMatter, LGBTI Human Rights news, refugees, and generally about politics, culture, and current affairs.

     

    Previous Online Abuse:

    Some of my posts on Twitter have brought considerable abuse, both on and offline.

    In the extreme, I’ve had death threats, late night telephone calls, pizza deliveries, call outs by the fire service. The more inane abuse includes insults about my sexual orientation, racism, and crude references about the fact I am HIV. They have also targeted my partner and his work, incurring business costs, due to a suspected cyber attack.

    I’ve also had individuals publish my personal information and steal photos of my family and I from my Facebook account and reposted on Twitter with obscenities.

    Quite understandably, I have sometimes been outraged and felt moments of disgust and almost violent anger.

    If someone abuses, uses my copyright, insults me, I will generally retort. I usually tell them to fuck off, go suicide, tell them I will ruin them, call them a cunt, or whatever.

    Here’s a take on my philosophy regarding online abuse:

    twitter-header

     

    As you can see, and I am sure you will understand, because of the abuse I’ve received, I generally will not take any drama or shit from anyone. Anyone who abuses me will get short shrift and told exactly where to shove it.

    Abuse I have received from women is no different. If a woman, on social media, messages me or replies to something I have posted, with which she disagrees, with any abuse, profanity, threats, or bile, I will retort. That is quid pro quo and is the essence of gender equality, imho. No special favours, except where inequality or misogyny is present or exists.

     

    Recent Abuse:

    Just recently, one such woman, by the name of Jasna Badzak, despite having a police warning against her, and having been served with a cease and desist notice, not to abuse or harass me, decided to have another go at me. Yes, she has done this before, hence the police warning and cease and desist notice.

    I didn’t respond to her directly, as such. What I did, was to collate the URLs of her tweets about me and publish them on Storify.

    Storify is simply a website that has the function of enabling a user to collect posts, articles, and comments on social media, to create a story.

    You can see them here:

    1. https://storify.com/debatingculture/mancial-rantings-of-convicted-fraudster-jasna-badz
    2. https://storify.com/debatingculture/final-warning-andreaurbanfox-and-jasnabadzak

    (Important: For context and clarity, please do ensure that you read through the above links — you can right click to open them in a new window).

     

    In the first link (above), it is perfectly clear that Jasna is a convicted fraudster. Equally as important, the content shows that she is vindictive to the point of being mentally disturbed.

    The second link, shows the abuse and vitriol directed at me, after I was informed that she was sullying my name and spreading malicious and false gossip about me.

    I didn’t respond directly (well, only to her most ludicrous claims), but I did document and record her abuse and vitriol, hence the publication of the Storify.

     

    Hacking My Social Media:

    Within 24 hours of the publication of the Storify in the second link (above), Jasna, and/ or an associate, made 6 attempts to hack my twitter account. The evidence of which, is here:

    Screen Shot 2016-09-08 at 14.06.33.png

     

    The first attempted password hack, occurred on Sunday, 04 September, 2016.

    On the Monday morning, I immediately contacted the police and Twitter and posted information to my followers to inform them of what was happening to me.

    By Tuesday, 06 September, 2016, a blog was published about myself and others, regarding our views on Israel and its oppression of Palestinians and occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

    The blog was published by Marko Attila Hoare.

    Marko is a Historian, lecturing at Kingston University, UK, so you would expect someone of his professional and academic standing to be less abusive, but, apparently not. Marko is a known internet troll. (Three separate links, detailing his bullying, character assassination, and intimidation of others).

    Within 24 hours of the publication Marko’s blog, there were a further 29 attempts to hack my password to my Twitter account. I have no idea if Marko himself was involved, but his blog was a direct causal link to these further hack attempts.

    It’s worth noting here, that Jasna and Marko are associates and know each other in public circles and they are ‘twiends’ on the Twattersphere.

    How timely that Jasna abuses me online, then there are several attempts to hack my twitter when I retort, then Marko writes a defamatory blog about me, resulting in a further 29 hack attempts?

    I have no idea why Marko wrote his blog about myself and others. I haven’t communicated with him since January, 2016, so it is more than a coincidence, that he pops up from nowhere, with a blog, in which I am mentioned, two days after Jasna’s abuse, and the resulting 35 hack attempts to gain access to my Twitter account.

    Interestingly, Jasna has now resorted to sending herself repeated login requests to her own Twitter account, claiming that I am trying to hack her.

     

    Israel Silencing Its Critics and JewHate:

    As one of my followers said: There is no such thing as coincidence.

    Indeed. All of this was an orchestrated attack on my good name, my protection from harassment, freedom of speech, security, privacy, and right to expression.

    In his blog, Marko first accuses me of being antiSemitic.

    First of all, I object to the use of the term of ‘antiSemitism/ ic’. Why? Because Palestinians are also Semites.

    This is not tautology; this is irrefutable genetic fact.

    The term ‘antiSemitic/ ism’ has been appropriated and misused by many Jews and Zionists, alike, to refer to Jews only, thus giving Jews special status and victimhood, for the heinous crimes of the monster that was Adolf Hitler.

    I do not hate Jews nor am I guilty of JewHate either; I am part Jewish on my GrandFather’s side.

    Here’s former Israeli Minister, Shulamit Aloni’s view on ‘antiSemitism’:
    Human Rights View:

    As stated earlier, I am a Human Rights campaigner.

    Many of my efforts, articles, posts, and tweets, on social media, are about Israeli war crimes, Human Rights abuse, illegal settlements, and occupation of Palestinian rights and lands.

    That said, I also criticise Saudi, Russia, the US, Myanmar, France, Turkiye, the UK, Zimbabwe, and many other Human Rights abusers.

    My critiques, campaigns etc, against Human Rights abusers, and their leaders and supporters, does not make me discriminatory or prejudiced against them, so why should Marko, or anyone else, claim that I am prejudice against Israeli citizens, for the action of its state actors or institutions?

    Marko’s blog was a blatant attempt to provoke me, silence me, and/ or damage me. That is absolutely clear!

    Marko also accused me of abusing him, which is an outright lie. The only thing I have ever said or done to him, is ask him to retract his false and malicious claims about me.

    I ask you, in what warped universe is that considered abuse, of any sort?

    He also claims that I misrepresent Palestinian rights and organisations who support and promote Palestinian rights and freedoms.

    Note: I have never claimed to represent Palestinians or any organisation that either supports and promotes Palestinian rights and freedoms.

     

    I merely speak from my heart, that Israel (Israhell!!)- and yes, Hamas – are both guilty of war crimes and should be brought to the international criminal court.

    Marko’s blog about me, was a deliberate, orchestrated hatchet job against me!

    I am in no doubt that members of the pro-Israeli lobby, and supporters of, put him up to this smear campaign against me.

    Indeed, what demented and vindictive individual would then try to hack my Twitter account on no less than 35 occasions, and why?

    Here’s a link to my initial response to Marko’s blog and hack attempts I received:

    https://storify.com/debatingculture/zionists-marko-hoare-and-attempted-hacking-of-my-t

     

    Lawfare and Silencing Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions:

    Incidentally, Marko and Jasna’s lawyer, is the Zionist Jew, Mark Lewis. Mark and I have history. He has tried and failed several times to falsely report me to the police, encourage others to harass me, and made failed attempts to bring me to court for my stance against Israel’s war crimes.

    Here is more on Mark Lewis:

    https://storify.com/debatingculture/here-s-mlewislawyer-slandering-threatening-and-wis

    https://storify.com/debatingculture/the-curious-case-of-richard-simmons-the-hasbara-tr

    (Note: Zionism is not a pejorative term and do not conflate Zionism with Judaism, as not all Jews are Zionists and vice versa. To do so, only serves and validates Zionism itself). 

     

    Since January, 2016, Mark Lewis, has been subject to a complaint (by me) with the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which is why he will not engage me directly, and uses Marko and Jasna to do so instead.

    Jasna makes that clear, here:

    Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 21.42.58.png

     

    This is what is called organised lawfare, by Jews, Zionists, and pro-Israel supporters, to silence valid debate on the atrocities committed by both sides in the Israeli – Palestinian conflict.

    This is not conspiracy theory, false flag, flat earth, paranoid delusion. It is real, and it is happening to me, because I have taken a stance and choose to speak out against it, despite the outcomes.

    Many Zionists and pro-Israeli groups and individuals have called for the murder and ruination of those who criticise Israel’s war crimes:

    http://www.middleeastrising.com/israeli-ministers-call-civil-targeted-killing-bds-activists-barghouti-mentioned-name/

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/208429

    http://freebeacon.com/issues/anti-israel-groups-lobby-to-derail-anti-bds-measure/

    https://www.rt.com/uk/358543-israel-palestine-boycott-erdan/#.V9CD_AaVlkE.twitter

    My humanitarian views, should not mean I or other like-minded, concerned individuals, are deserving of such vitriol, abuse, and smears against us.

    Vitriolic Abuse and Hatred:

    Below are examples of how hatefilled, demented, and vindictive the likes of Zionists like Marko, Jasna, and Mark are:

    Screen Shot 2016-09-07 at 22.50.13.png

    This is Jasna Badzak admitting to setting up troll account to abuse and harass me.

    screen-shot-2016-09-09-at-21-51-36

    screen-shot-2016-09-09-at-01-22-31Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 22.01.40.png

    Yes, I am HIV. Through no fault of my own, but that of someone I love, and remain with to this day.

    Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 15.29.13.png

    The above is an image that shows a partial email address belonging to Jasna Badzak. In a moment of extreme anger, she admitted this by posting a tweet I have shown above.

    I also possess another image, which shows a partial image of her mobile/ cell phone number. Yes, I have Jasna’s number, as she once gave it to me, before she decided to vilify me.

     

    Zionist Plot, Conspiracy, Paranoia, or Fallacy:

    zionism

    So you think all this attempted hacking of my account and Marko’s malicious blog is either completely made up, or just free speech, at worst.. a case of trolling?

    Well, I’ve already provided you with proof that there were attempts to hack my account, in a screenshot, above.

    As explained above, I have been trolled and abused online many times; it’s why I am so profane about and to those who do so. However, no one has ever tried to hack my Twitter account, until Jasna’s abuse and Marko’s blog about me, within two days of each other.

    It is also a fact, that Mark Lewis has previously provided legal representation for both Jasna and Marko, and they all know and follow each other offline. In addition, all of them regularly attack those who challenge or criticise Israel.

    So what, other than this?

    Cue in David Hirsh, who is a lecturer at Goldsmiths.

    David has been described as an ‘ultra-Zionist’. He’s also been described as a fierce opponent of all boycotts of Israel, who actively conflate the BDS movement and anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, by which, he actually means hatred against Jews (1).

    David is also founder (2) of the blog site, on which Marko published his blog. I know this because the site is registered in David’s own name and at his home address in Reading (3).

    Marko and David are also friends and colleagues and review each other’s work, write articles and letters together, on issues of Zionism and BDS, and regularly conspiring to accuse Israel’s critics of ‘antischwemitism’ by means of defaming them (4 & 5). David is also linked to the Board of Deputies and the Community Service Trust (6). He also has links to Simon Cobbs of Sussex Friends, who is a member of the terrorist organisation, Jewish Defence League (7). David is also an associate of Jewish Chronicle editor, Stephen Pollard, in that they both sit on several Boards and Advisory Panels together (8).

    Incidentally, after Jasna recommenced her abuse of me, she was contacted byJosh Jackman to write and article about myself and others for the Jewish Chronicle (9). I understand Josh decided not to go ahead with the article, after I sent him an email advising him of the repercussions if he did so.

    These links below, prove that Marko, Jasna, David, and Mark Lewis, attempted at hatchet job in a pathetic smear blog, to defame myself and others:

    (1) https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=david+hirsh+zionism&hl=en-GB&gbv=1&oq=david+hirsh+zionism&gs_l=heirloom-serp.3…4634.6719.0.7113.7.7.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0….0…1ac.1.34.heirloom-serp..7.0.0.3CUeZxf0FRg

    (2) https://whois.domaintools.com/engageonline.org.uk

    (3) http://www.cbetta.com/director/david-hirsh-2

    (4) https://duckduckgo.com/?q=david+hirsh+marko+hoare&atb=v29-5__&ia=web

    (5) https://www.dissentmagazine.org/wp-content/files_mf/1390433961d15Letters.pdf

    (6) https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=david+hirsh+cst&hl=en-GB&gbv=1&oq=david+hirsh+cst&gs_l=heirloom-serp.3…2713.3294.0.4168.3.3.0.0.0.0.335.751.0j1j1j1.3.0….0…1ac.1.34.heirloom-serp..2.1.335.6jvpq4BIu1Y

    (7) https://duckduckgo.com/?q=simon+cobbs+jewish+defence+league&t=opera&ia=web

    (8) http://eiscablog.eu/board/

    (9) https://twitter.com/josh_jackman/status/774243629821034497 

    I think I have more than established here, the connections motive and intentions. If you still doubt me, you must have an acute case of cognitive dissonance.

    To paraphrase Aristotle, you have defaulted to the (Zionist) lie, as this is all you know, and when shown the truth, refuse to deviate from the lie you’ve had drilled into you!

     

    What Happens Next:

    In conclusion, I would like to remind those who are watching me and seeking to silence and/ or discredit me, it will not work!

    To those who support me, solidarity!

    Now all matters are in the hands of the police and authorities.

    Screen Shot 2016-09-09 at 21.53.27.png

    Screen Shot 2016-09-08 at 17.41.46.png

     

    Update:

    It seems Marko will not heed my request to cease and desist his abuse and smears of me.

    In his own words, he has now said that he is going to go all out to “expose” me, as he put it. I must now take this as a serious threat to defame me, to damage my name, credibility and my work.

    As this is clearly targeted abuse by Marko to malign me, I believe that it also constitutes a clear and cut case of harassment with menaces; as such, I must now take further action.

    screen-shot-2016-09-18-at-17-06-58

    Wrong move, Marko!

     

    Special Note:

    I will not be silenced by anyone! Indeed. Your efforts to silence or hurt me, will only make me stronger!

    In the words of my late acquaintance, and a fellow Human Rights activist, Said El Said: Up the Rebels!

    All comments, images, and other information posted in this blog, are in the public domain and believed to be a matter of public record. I, Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann, have posted in good faith, in the belief that the contents of this blog are true and not in any way specious or false.

     

    By Jason Lee, of the family: Schumann

    Zionist Lobby Uses #UK LGBT ‘Pink News’ to Skew Iran Deal

    2 Sep

    Originally Publish on News786, 2015

     

    In a comment piece entitled ‘Why LGBT people should oppose the Iran nuclear deal’, Berlin-based Journalist, Bejamin Weinthal, was given a platform by the Editors of British-based, online news site, Pink News, to write an op-ed on the Iran Deal, about the country’s ill-treatment of the LGBT community, which it published in its Current Affairs section on the 08 August 2015. In addition to telling us that the deal is bad for LGBT people in Iran, Weinthal also wrote that the deal was [would also be] bad for the global LGBT community.

    In his piece, Weinthal fails to offer a single reason, source, explanation, or evidence to confirm, substantiate or support his claim that the deal is bad for LGBT community in Iran or even globally. His only hint at a reason, was in reference to a remark he made on ‘the abolition of Iran’s death penalty for gays and lesbians, with the nuclear accord.’ However dreadful and abhorrent Iran’s Human Rights record and ill-treatment of its own people is, abolition of the death penalty was not part of the Vienna Accord, nor on the table for any part of the discussions.

    What was on the table, and at the core of discussions, was non-proliferation and Iran’s acceptance of limits on its nuclear programme, in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. There is not a single mention, or reference, in the 159-page Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action report to either the death penalty, or LGBT Rights. The only reference to Human Rights is the US-imposed ‘Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Right Act 2012’, which was enacted primarily to impose sanctions based on Iran’s energy and financial sectors; proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and support for terrorism.

    Weinthal quotes figures from WikiLeaks and Amnesty International on the estimated number of executions, since the founding of the republic in 1979. He also added, ‘Executions have increased since Iran’s allegedly moderate president Hassan Rouhani’.

    Indeed, in 2014, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said: “He (Rouhani) has not made any significant improvement in ending human rights abuses since taking office.” But again, although this is without question, a deplorable state of affairs, what does this have to do with the deal and the discussions that took place in Vienna?

    Weinthal goes on to criticize the reciprocal economic benefits of the deal for international business and governments, in stating, ‘European companies are flocking to Iran to sell “dual-use” equipment that can be used for military or civilian purposes’, which is clearly a misleading claim, as most countries have stated, publicly, that they will not permit this, including Britain, France, and Germany.

    Rather desperately, Weinthal attempts to implore our (yes, I am Ghey) sympathies by stating, ‘some prominent gays have profoundly misjudged the terror of Iran’s regime.’ In response to which, I would ask Weinthal how my fellow members of the international LGBT community have done so? After-all, we didn’t take part in the discussions or strike the deal, did we?

    So why is Pink News giving him column inches, and why is Weinthal seeking to persuade LGBT-ers to speak out against the Iran deal? As it turns out, the whole piece was a complete plant, instigated by Israel’s propaganda machine and the Zionist lobby agenda. What proof do I offer, you may ask? Well, first, the Chief Executive of Pink News, is Benjamin Cohen, who is Jewish and well acquainted with Weinthal since as early as 2012. Weinthal is also Jewish and a known Zionist. Both Cohen and Weinthal believe passionately in Israel’s right to exist and have posted on social media and written so. It is perfectly clear, having conducted various online searches, that neither Cohen nor Weinthal are fans of the Iranian regime; especially, as Weinthal is so vehemently outspoken and critical of Iran.

    Oh, did I mention that it was Cohen, who gave Weinthal the idea to include the persecuted Iranian poet, Payam Feili in his op-ed? Weinthal is also a fellow of the Right-wing think tank, Foundation for Defense of Democracies, which is largely funded by pro-Israeli, Republican and international Jewish donors, and which is focused on national security and foreign policy issues.

    Of course we should condemn and challenge Iran’s Human Rights record, and we have and will continue to do so. For his own campaigning efforts to highlight abuses, the prominent British LGBT Activist, Peter Tatchell, has been labelled by Iranian authorities, as a spy.

    However, I am in full agreement with Weinthal, when he suggests that the deal should be renegotiated to include addressing Iran’s Human Rights record. That said, this should have been on the table from the start of discussions. It is therefore too late in the day to even consider this option. Now we have the deal, and once political ties have improved and stabilized, only we can begin the dialogue about other important issues, like pushing for Human Rights.

    As readers were quick to realize; Weinthal’s op-ed article, was clearly a propaganda piece to support, and promote, Israeli identity politics and nation-building. As one reader noted:

    “Daniel • 3 days ago

     Benjamin Weinthal’s latest article for the Jerusalem post: “

    Analysis: Is Germany’s pro-Iran deal diplomatic offensive a threat to Israel’s security?”

    For some reason I doubt his position has anything to do with LGBT rights.”

     

    Another said:

    “Daniel M Y • 3 days ago

    But that has absolutely NOTHING to do with their nuclear program, so why don’t you ‘keep to the point’? This author’s beef is with the threat a nuclear Iran could pose to Israel, but instead of coming out and saying it he’s implying that all he cares about is LGBT rights. The fact that he doesn’t mention Israel even once in this article shows how disingenuous he is.”

     

    Out of 100 comments on Weinthal’s piece; all suggested that it was Israeli propaganda, with no interest or genuine concern for LGBT Rights.

    One last thing, readers: if we are to question Iran’s Human Rights record, should we not also question the United States, Russia, and China’s? All three countries have the death penalty, and woeful Human Rights records, in regard to LGBT rights. Israel’s Human Rights record also warrants as much questioning; particularly, in light of its treatment of African Jews and Palestinians.

     

    Sources:

    https://archive.is/TfB39

    http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/benjamin-weinthal-iran-cheat-article-1.2292276

    https://archive.is/LCurQ

    http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/d-c-s-premier-hawkish-thinktank-is-funded-by-israel-supporters-marcus-adelson-and-singer

    http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/07/19/271431/fdd-donors/

     

     

    Article by Jason Schumann, aka @debatingculture

     

    %d bloggers like this: